Interv Akut Kardiol. 2023;22(1):17-26 | DOI: 10.36290/kar.2023.003

Minimally invasive and robotic mitral valve surgery

Štěpán Černý
Kardiochirurgické oddělení, Nemocnice Na Homolce, Praha

Surgical treatment for mitral regurgitation has undergone dramatic development in the last four decades. To preserve the patient's native valve and restore its proper function with conserving surgery is currently a clear priority in the surgical setting. This procedure is typically referred to as mitral valve repair. Currently, less invasive surgical approaches to the mitral valve are increasingly used that offer patients, in addition to being less invasive, stability and predictability of classic surgical repair based on the principles of modern mitral valve surgery. Video-assisted right-sided mini-thoracotomy or robotic surgery are the most commonly used approaches. In large patient cohorts, these approaches had similar surgical outcomes in terms of valve repairability and displayed lower rates of early complications, lower rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation, lower blood product utilization, shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, shorter intensive care unit stay, and shorter overall duration of hospital stay. Subsequently, a rapid return to normal activities is possible. This is attractive for young patients, particularly in the light of the new guidelines of professional societies wherein the indications for conserving surgery shift to groups of asymptomatic patients and the procedures are preventive in nature. In future, these approaches can be expected to become the standard of care for these patients, further highlighting the need to create specialized centres of excellence for surgical treatment of the mitral valve.

Keywords: mitral valve repair, minimally invasive approach, robotic surgery.

Accepted: March 27, 2023; Published: April 12, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Černý Š. Minimally invasive and robotic mitral valve surgery. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2023;22(1):17-26. doi: 10.36290/kar.2023.003.
Download citation

References

  1. Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery - the "French correction". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;86(3):323-37. Go to original source...
  2. Carpentier AF, Lessana A, Relland JY, et al. The "physio­‑ring": an advanced concept in mitral valve annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60(5):1177-85; discussion 1185-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. David TE. Replacement of chordae tendineae with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures. J Cardiac Surg. 1989;4:286-90. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. von Oppel UO, Mohr FW. Chordal replacement for both minimally invasive and conventional mitral valve surgery using premeasured Gore­‑Tex loops. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:2166-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Žáček P. Chirurgická léčba mitrální nedomykavosti jako zlatý standard. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2023;22(1):12-16. Go to original source...
  6. Kouchoukos NT, Blackstone EH, Hanley FL, et al. Mitral Valve Disease with or without Tricuspid Valve Disease. Kirklin/Barrat­‑Boyes Cardiac Surgery. 4th ed. Ste: Elsevier Saunders; 2013, p. 474-540.
  7. Castillo JG, Anyanwu AC, Fuster V, et al. A near 100% repair rate for mitral valve prolapse is achiaevable in a reference center: Implication for future guidelines. Thorac CArdiovasc Surg. 2012;144:308-12. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Yazdich F, Koch CG, Mihajlevic T, et al. Increasing Disadvantage fo "Watchfull waiting" for repairing digenerative mitral valve disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(6):1992-2000. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. DiBardino DJ, ElBardissi AW, McClure RS, et al. Four decades of experience with mitral valve repair: analysis of differential indications, technical evolution, and long­‑term outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139(1):76-83; discussion 83-4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Braunberger E, Deloche A, Berrebi A, et al. Very long­‑term results (more than 20 years) of valve repair with Carpentier's techniques in nonrheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Circulation. 2001;104(12 Suppl 1):I8-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Seeburger J, Borger MA, Doll N, et al. Comparison of outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for posterior, anterior and bileaflet prolapse. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36(3):532-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Enriquez­‑Sarano M, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, et al. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation. A multivariate analysis. Circulation. 1995;91(4):1022-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Enriquez­‑Sarano M, Suri RM, Clavel MA, et al. Is there an outcome penalty linked to guideline­‑based indications for valvular surgery? Early and long­‑term analysis of patients with organic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(1):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015. 04. 009. Epub 2015 Apr 9. Go to original source...
  14. Enriquez­‑Sarano M, Sundt TM 3rd. Early surgery is recommended for mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2010 Feb 16;121(6):804-11; discussion 812. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(7):561-632. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Ramlawi B, Gammie JS. MItral vavle surgery: Current minimally invasive and transcatheter options. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2016;12(1):20-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Bonatti J, Crailsheim I, Grabenwoger M, et al. Minimally invasive and robotic mitral valve surgery: Methods and outcomes in a 20-Year Review. Innovations (Phila). 2021;16(4): 317-326. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Wolfe JA, Malaisrie SC, Farivar RS, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery II. Surgical technique and postoperative management. Innovations (Phila). 2016;11(4):251-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Van Praet KM, Kofler M, Sundermann SHet al. Endoaortic ballon occlusion during mininally invasive mitral valve surgery. Innovations. 2022;17(2):83-87. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Chan J, Oo S, Butt S, et al. Network meta­‑analysis comparing blood cardioplegia, Del Nido cardioplegia and custodiol cardioplegia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Perfusion. 2022;0(0). doi:10.1177/02676591221075522. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Carpentier A, et al. Open heart operation under videosurgery and minithoracotomy. First case (mitral valvuloplasty) operated with success. C R Acad Sci III. 1996;319(3):219-23.
  22. Schroeyers P, Wellens F, De Geest R, et al. Minimally invasive video­‑assisted mitral valve surgery: Our lessons after a 4-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:S1050-4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Mohr FW, Onnasch JF, Falk V, et al. The evolution of minimally invasive valve surgery - 2 year experience. Eur J Cardiothor Surg. 1999;15(3):233-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Poffo R, Pope RB, Toschi AP, et al. Video­‑assisted minimally invasive mitral valve repair: periareolar approach. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2009;24(3):425-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Westhofen S, Conradi L, Deuse T, et al. A mateched pairs analysis of non­‑rib­‑spreading, fully endoscopic, mini­‑incision technique versus conventional mini­‑thoracotomy for mitral valve repair. Eur J Cardiothor Surg. 2016;50(6):1181-1187. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Vanermen A, Van Praet F, Degrick I, et al. Endoscopic mitral valve repair. Operative Techniques in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 16(4):278-292.
  27. Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Aupecle B, et al. Computer assisted open heart surgery. First case operAusated with success. CR Acad Sci III. 1998:321(5):437-442. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Autschbach R, Onnasch JF, Falk V, et al. The Liepzig experience with robotic valve surgery. J Card Surg. 2000;15(1):82-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Murphy DA, Moss E, Binnongo J, et al. The Expanding role of endoscopic Robotics in Mitral Valve Surgery: 1,257 Consecutive Procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:1675-82. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Bonatti J, Kiaii B, Alhan C, et al. The role of robotic technology in minimally invasive surgery for mitral valve disease. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021;18(10):955-970. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Franke UFW, Huether F, Ghinescu M, et al. Robotically asssited mitral valve surgery - experience during the restart of a robotic program in Germany. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;11(6):596-604. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Palmen M, Navarra E, Bonatti J, et al. Current state of the art and recommendations in robotic mitral valve surgery. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2022;35(6):ivac160. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac160. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Falk V, Cheng DC, Martin J, et al. Minimally invasive versus open mitral valve surgery: a consensus statement of the international society of minimally invasive coronary surgery (ISMICS) 2010. Innovations (Phila). 2011;6(2):66-76. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Grant SW, Hickley GL, Modi P, et al. Propensity­‑matched analysis of minimally invasive approach versus sternotomy for mitral valve surgery. Heart. 2019;105:783-789. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Eqbal AJ, Gupta S, Basha A, et al. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery versus conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: A systematic review and meta­‑analysis of 119 studies. J Card Surg. 2022;37:1319-1327. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Bonatti J, Crailsheim I, Grabenwoger M, et al. Minimally invasive and robotic mitral valve surgery: Methods and outcomes in a 20-year review. Innovations (Phila). 2021;16(4):317-326. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Gillinov AM, Mihajlevic T, Javadigaskari H, et al. Early results of robotically assisted mitral valve surgery: Analysis of the first 1000 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(1):82-91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Loulmet DF, Ranganath NK, Neuburger PJ, et al. Can Complex Mitral Valve Repair Be Performed With Robotics? An Institution's Experience Utilizing a Dedicated Team Approach in 500 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56(3):470-478. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Williams ML, Hwang B, Huang L, et al. Robotic vesrsus conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta­‑analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;11(5):490-503.
  40. Hassanabad AF, Nagese FNI, Basha AM, et al. A systematic review and meta­‑analysis of robot­‑assisted mitral valve repair. Innovations. 2022;17(6):471-481. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Williams ML, Eranki A, Mamo A, et al. Systematic review and meta­‑analysis of mid­‑term survival, reoperation, and recurrent mitral regurgitation for robotic­‑assisted mitral valve repair. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;11(6):553-563. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Navarra E, Mastrobuoni S, De Kerchove L, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair: a European single­‑centre experience. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;25(1):62-67. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Kesävuori R, Raivio P, Jokinen JJ, et al. Early experience with robotic mitral valve repair with intra­‑aortic occlusion. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(4):1463-1471. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Cerny S, Oosterlinck W, Onan B, et al. Robotic Cardiac Surgeery in Europe: Status 2020. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 20;8:827515. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.827515. Go to original source...




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.