Interv Akut Kardiol. 2021;20(1):11-12

Direktní stenting: ano či ne?

František Holm
Fakulta zdravotnických studií Technické Univerzity Liberec, Kardiologie Na Bulovce, Praha

Motto: Direktní stenting použiji v případě, že 5 minut před smrtí jsem buď já, nebo pacient.

Published: April 29, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Holm F. Direktní stenting: ano či ne? Interv Akut Kardiol. 2021;20(1):11-12.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Vojáček J. Andreas Grüntzig - zakladatel intervenční kardiologie. Interv Akut Kardiol 2007; 6(4): 127-128.
    2. Holm F. Trombóza koronárního stentu: problém stále trvá. Interv Akut Kardiol 2020; 19(2): 117-121. Go to original source...
    3. Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S, et al. Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with ultrasound intravascular guidance. Circulation 1995; 91: 1676-1688. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Rogers C, et al. Endogenous cell seeding. Remmant endothelium after stenting enhances vascular repair. Circulation 1996; 94: 2909-2914. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Loubeyre C, et al. Stenting without predilatation (direct stenting) prevents myonecrosis in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa treatment. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 164H.
    6. Sabatier R, et al. Could direct coronary stenting reduce no-reflow in acute coronary syndromes? A radomized pilot study. Am Heart J 2002; 143: 1027-1032. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Baim DS, et al. Comparison predilatation vs direct stenting in coronary treatment using Medtronic AVE 5670 coronary stent systém (The PREDICT trial). Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 1364-1369. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Ballarino M, et al. Multicenter randomized comparison of direct vs conventional stenting: the DIRECTO trial. Circulation 2000; 102: 2675.
    9. Moses JW, et al. The SIRIUS-DIRECT trial: a multi-center study of direct stenting using the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with de novo native coronary artery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70(4): 505-512. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Piscione F, et al. Is direct stenting superior to stenting with predilatation in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention? Results from a meta-analysis of 24 randomised trials. Heart 2010; 96(8): 588-594. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Remkes WS, et al. Direct Drug-Eluting Stenting to Reduce Stent Restenosis. A Randomized Comparison of Direct Stent Implantation for Conventional Stenting With Pre-Dilatation or Provisional Stenting in Elective PCI Patients. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2014; 7(7): 751-758. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Chevalier B, et al. Comparison of three coronary stenting techniques in acute myocardial infarction angioplasty. Eur Hear J 2000; 212(644): P3533.
    13. Figulla HR, et al. Direct coronary stenting withous predilatation: a new therapeutic approach with a special balloon catheter design. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1998; 43: 245-252. Go to original source...
    14. Elbaz M, et al. Is direct coronary stenting the best strategy for long-term outcome? Results of the multicentric randomized benefit evaluation of direct coronary stenting (BET) study. Am Heart J 2002; 144(4): E7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    Return to the content


    Interventional Cardiology

    Madam, Sir,
    please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
    Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

    I declare:

    1. that I have met the above instruction
    2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited

    No
    Yes

    If your statement is not true, please be aware
    that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.