Interv Akut Kardiol. 2020;19(1):31-38 | DOI: 10.36290/kar.2020.016

State-of-the-art PCI for coronary artery chronic total occlusion

Vojtěch Novotný
Kardiologické centrum AGEL, a. s., Pardubice

PCI for chronic total occlusion (CTO) of coronary arteries is one of the most dynamically developing fields in interventional cardiology. The issue itself involves some controversy. These are very complex procedures which, on the one hand, can significantly improve the quality of life of many patients, but on the other hand, are burdened by a higher risk of periprocedural complications compared to common non-CTO PCI. The fact that, even in our conditions, dedicated CTO programmes with increasing numbers of these procedures were set up at some centres implies that it is a current issue. The review article presents an abridged version of a state-of-the-art document developed by world-renowned experts in the subject of CTO. The basic principles of a successful and safe CTO PCI programme are divided into seven general principles, ranging from indications to planning of procedures and their technical aspects to minimizing the risk of developing and/or possibly managing complications.

Keywords: CTO, chronic total occlusion, PCI, state-of-the-art, review article.

Published: June 1, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Novotný V. State-of-the-art PCI for coronary artery chronic total occlusion. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2020;19(1):31-38. doi: 10.36290/kar.2020.016.
Download citation

References

  1. Fefer P, Knudtson ML, Cheema AN, et al. Current perspectives on coronary chronic total occlusions: the Canadian Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusions Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59(11): 991-997. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Ivanhoe RJ, Weintraub WS, Douglas JS Jr, et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of chronic total occlusions. Primary success, restenosis, and long-term clinical follow-up. Circulation 1992; 85(1): 106-115. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Suero JA, Marso SP, Jones PG, et al. Procedural Outcomes and Long-Term Survival Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of a Chronic Total Occlusion in Native Coronary Arteries: A 20-Year Experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38(2): 409-414. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Brilakis ES, Mashayekhi K, Tsuchikane E, et al. Guiding Principles for Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circulation 2019; 140(5): 420-433. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Werner GS, Martin-Yuste V, Hildick-Smith D, et al.; EUROCTO trial investigators. A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39: 2484-2493. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Obedinskiy AA, Kretov EI, Boukhris M, et al. The IMPACTOR-CTO Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11: 1309-1311. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Sapontis J, Salisbury AC, Yeh RW, et al. Early procedural and health status outcomes after chronic total occlusion angioplasty: a report from the OPEN-CTO Registry (Outcomes, Patient Health Status, and Efficiency in Chronic Total Occlusion Hybrid Procedures). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10: 1523-1534. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Christakopoulos GE, Christopoulos G, Carlino M, et al. Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusions. Am J Cardiol. 2015; 115: 1367-1375. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Joyal D, Afilalo J, Rinfret S. Effectiveness of recanalization of chronic total occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2010; 160: 179-187. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Ybarra LF, Dautov R, Gibrat C, Dandona S, Rinfret S. Midterm angina-related quality of life benefits after percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions. Can J Cardiol. 2017; 33: 1668-1674. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Lee SW, Lee PH, Ahn JM, et al. Randomized trial evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of chronic total occlusion: the DECISION-CTO Trial. Circulation 139: 1674-1683. Go to original source...
  12. Mashayekhi K, Neuser H, Kraus A, et al. Successful percutaneous coronary intervention improves cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with chronic total occlusions.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69: 1095-1096. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Bruckel JT, Jaffer FA, O'Brien C, et al. Angina severity, depression, and response to percutaneous revascularization in patients with chronic total occlusion of coronary arteries.J Invasive Cardiol. 2016; 28: 44-51.
  14. Werner GS, Ferrari M, Heinke S, et al. Angiographic assessment of collateral connections in comparison with invasively determined collateral function in chronic coronary occlusions. Circulation 2003; 107: 1972-1977. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Sachdeva R, Agrawal M, Flynn SE, Werner GS, Uretsky BF. The myocardium supplied by a chronic total occlusion is a persistently ischemic zone. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 83: 9-16. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Galassi AR, Boukhris M, Toma A, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10: 2158-2170. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Megaly M, Saad M, Tajti P, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention on left ventricular systolic function and reverse remodeling. J Interv Cardiol. 2018; 31: 562-571. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Henriques JP, Hoebers LP, Råmunddal T, et al.; EXPLORE Trial Investigators. Percutaneous intervention for concurrent chronic total occlusions in patients with STEMI: the EXPLORE Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68: 1622-1632. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Mashayekhi K, Nührenberg TG, Toma A, et al. A randomized trial to assess regional left ventricular function after stent implantation in chronic total occlusion: the REVASC Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11: 1982-1991. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Nombela-Franco L, Mitroi CD, Fernández-Lozano I, et al. Ventricular arrhythmias among implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients for primary prevention: impact of chronic total coronary occlusion (VACTO Primary Study). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5: 147-154. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Nombela-Franco L, Iannaccone M, Anguera I, et al. Impact of chronic total coronary occlusion on recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias in ischemic secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients (VACTO Secondary Study): insights from coronary angiogram and electrogram analysis.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10: 879-888. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Di Marco A, Paglino G, Oloriz T, et al. Impact of a chronic total occlusion in an infarct-related artery on the long-term outcome of ventricular tachycardia ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015; 26: 532-539. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. O'Connor SA, Garot P, Sanguineti F, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact on mortality of noninfarct-related artery coronary chronic total occlusion in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2015; 116: 8-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. George S, Cockburn J, Clayton TC, et al.; British Cardiovascular Intervention Society; National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research. Long-term follow-up of elective chronic total coronary occlusion angioplasty: analysis from the U.K. Central Cardiac Audit Database. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64: 235-243. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Tomasello SD, Boukhris M, Giubilato S, et al. Management strategies in patients affected by chronic total occlusions: results from the Italian Registry of Chronic Total Occlusions. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36: 3189-3198. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Yang JH, Kim BS, Jang WJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with coronary chronic total occlusion - a propensity-matched analysis. Circ J. 2016; 80: 211-217. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Garcia S, Sandoval Y, Roukoz H, et al. Outcomes after complete versus incomplete revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 89,883 patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62: 1421-1431. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Goel PK, Khanna R, Pandey CM, Ashfaq F. Long-term outcomes post chronic total occlusion intervention-implications of completeness of revascularization. J Interv Cardiol. 2018; 31: 293-301. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40: 87-165. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Azzalini L, Agostoni P, Benincasa S, et al. Retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention through ipsilateral collateral channels: a multicenter registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10: 1489-1497. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Brilakis ES, Grantham JA, Rinfret S, et al. A percutaneous treatment algorithm for crossing coronary chronic total occlusions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5: 367-379. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Brilakis ES. Manual of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions. A Step-By-Step Approach. 2nd ed. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier; 2017. Go to original source...
  33. Azzalini L, Carlino M, Brilakis ES, et al. Subadventitial techniques for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: the concept of "vessel architecture". Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 91: 725-734. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Galassi AR, Tomasello SD, Crea F, et al. Transient impairment of vasomotion function after successful chronic total occlusion recanalization.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 711-718. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. McEntegart MB, Badar AA, Ahmad FA, et al. The collateral circulation of coronary chronic total occlusions. EuroIntervention. 2016; 11: e1596-e1603. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Huang CC, Lee CK, Meng SW, et al. Collateral channel size and tortuosity predict retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention success for chronic total occlusion. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11: e005124. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Dautov R, Urena M, Nguyen CM, Gibrat C, Rinfret S. Safety and effectiveness of the surfing technique to cross septal collateral channels during retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention. 2017; 12: e1859-e1867. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Tajti P, Karatasakis A, Karmpaliotis D, et al. Retrograde CTO-PCI of native coronary arteries via left internal mammary artery grafts: insights from a multicenter U.S. registry. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018; 30: 89-96. Go to PubMed...
  39. Rathore S, Katoh O, Matsuo H, et al. Retrograde percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the coronary arteries: procedural outcomes and predictors of success in contemporary practice. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2: 124-132. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Benincasa S, Azzalini L, Carlino M, et al. Outcomes of the retrograde approach through epicardial versus non-epicardial collaterals in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017; 18: 393-398. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Morino Y, Abe M, Morimoto T, et al. J-CTO Registry Investigators. Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes: the J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score as a difficulty grading and time assessment tool. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 4: 213-221. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Tanaka H, Morino Y, Abe M, et al. Impact of J-CTO score on procedural outcome and target lesion revascularisation after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: a substudy of the J-CTO Registry (Multicentre CTO Registry in Japan). EuroIntervention. 2016; 11: 981-988. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Christopoulos G, Kandzari DE, Yeh RW, et al. Development and validation of a novel scoring system for predicting technical success of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions: the PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) Score. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9: 1-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Maeremans J, Spratt JC, Knaapen P, et al. Towards a contemporary, comprehensive scoring system for determining technical outcomes of hybrid percutaneous chronic total occlusion treatment: the RECHARGE score. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 91: 192-202. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  45. Alessandrino G, Chevalier B, Lefèvre T, et al. A clinical and angiographic scoring system to predict the probability of successful first-attempt percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with total chronic coronary occlusion. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8: 1540-1548. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  46. Galassi AR, Boukhris M, Azzarelli S, et al. Percutaneous coronary revascularization for chronic total occlusions: a novel predictive score of technical failure using advanced technologies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9: 911-922. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  47. Ellis SG, Burke MN, Murad MB, et al.; CAPS Group. Predictors of successful hybrid-approach chronic total coronary artery occlusion stenting: an improved model with novel correlates. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10: 1089-1098. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. Khanna R, Pandey CM, Bedi S, Ashfaq F, Goel PK. A weighted angiographic scoring model (W-CTO score) to predict success of antegrade wire crossing in chronic total occlusion: analysis from a single centre. AsiaIntervention. 2018; 4: 18-25. Go to original source...
  49. Szijgyarto Z, Rampat R, Werner GS, et al. Derivation and validation of a chronic total coronary occlusion intervention procedural success score from the 20,000-patient EuroCTO Registry: the EuroCTO (CASTLE) Score. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12: 335-342. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  50. Opolski MP, Achenbach S, Schuhbäck A, et al. Coronary computed tomographic prediction rule for time-efficient guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion: insights from the CT-RECTOR multicenter registry (Computed Tomography Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8: 257-267. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  51. Danek BA, Karatasakis A, Karmpaliotis D, et al. Development and validation of a scoring system for predicting periprocedural complications during percutaneous coronary interventions of chronic total occlusions: the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS CTO) Complications Score. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5: e004272. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  52. Azzalini L, Uretsky B, Brilakis ES, Colombo A, Carlino M. Contrast modulation in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 93: E24-E29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  53. Tajti P, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, et al. The hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: update from the PROGRESS CTO Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11: 1325-1335. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  54. Maeremans J, Walsh S, Knaapen P, et al. The hybrid algorithm for treating chronic total occlusions in Europe: the RECHARGE Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68: 1958-1970. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  55. Wilson WM, Walsh SJ, Yan AT, et al. Hybrid approach improves success of chronic total occlusion angioplasty. Heart 2016; 102: 1486-1493. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  56. Colombo A, Mikhail GW, Michev I, et al. Treating chronic total occlusions using subintimal tracking and reentry: the STAR technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005; 64: 407-411. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  57. Valenti R, Vergara R, Migliorini A, et al. Predictors of reocclusion after successful drug-eluting stent-supported percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61: 545-550. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  58. Godino C, Latib A, Economou FI, et al. Coronary chronic total occlusions: mid-term comparison of clinical outcome following the use of the guided-STAR technique and conventional anterograde approaches. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 79: 20-27. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  59. Hirai T, Grantham JA, Sapontis J, et al. OPEN CTO Study Group. Impact of subintimal plaque modification procedures on health status after unsuccessful chronic total occlusion angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 91: 1035-1042. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  60. Wilson WM, Bagnall AJ, Spratt JC. In case of procedure failure: facilitating future success. Interv Cardiol. 2013; 5: 521-531.. Go to original source...
  61. Goleski PJ, Nakamura K, Liebeskind E, et al. Revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions with subintimal tracking and reentry followed by deferred stenting: experience from a high-volume referral center. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 93: 191-198. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  62. Whitlow PL, Burke MN, Lombardi WL, et al. FAST-CTOs Trial Investigators. Use of a novel crossing and re-entry system in coronary chronic total occlusions that have failed standard crossing techniques: results of the FAST-CTOs (Facilitated Antegrade Steering Technique in Chronic Total Occlusions) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5: 393-401. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  63. Karacsonyi J, Tajti P, Rangan BV, et al. Randomized comparison of a crossboss first versus standard wire escalation strategy for crossing coronary chronic total occlusions: the CrossBoss First Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11: 225-233. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  64. Galassi AR, Boukhris M, Tomasello SD, et al. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of the mini-STAR technique as a bailout strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion. Can J Cardiol. 2014; 30: 1400-1406. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  65. Karatasakis A, Danek BA, Karacsonyi J, et al. Mid-term outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention with subadventitial vs. intraplaque crossing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 253: 29-34. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  66. Wilson WM, Walsh SJ, Bagnall A, et al. One-year outcomes after successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: the impact of dissection re-entry techniques.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 90: 703-712. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  67. Maeremans J, Dens J, Spratt JC, et al. RECHARGE Investigators. Antegrade dissection and reentry as part of the hybrid chronic total occlusion revascularization strategy: a subanalysis of the RECHARGE Registry (Registry of CrossBoss and Hybrid Procedures in France, the Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10: e004791. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  68. Azzalini L, Dautov R, Brilakis ES, et al. Procedural and longer-term outcomes of wire - versus device-based antegrade dissection and re-entry techniques for the percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions. Int J Cardiol. 2017; 231: 78-83. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  69. Danek BA, Karatasakis A, Karmpaliotis D, et al. Use of antegrade dissection re-entry in coronary chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in a contemporary multicenter registry. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 214: 428-437. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  70. Joyal D, Thompson CA, Grantham JA, Buller CE, Rinfret S. The retrograde technique for recanalization of chronic total occlusions: a step-by-step approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5: 1-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  71. Wu EB, Tsuchikane E, Lo S, et al. Retrograde algorithm for chronic total occlusion from the Asia Pacific Chronic Total Occlusion club. AsiaIntervention. 2018; 4: 98-107. Go to original source...
  72. Harding SA, Wu EB, Lo S, et al. A new algorithm for crossing chronic total occlusions from the Asia Pacific Chronic Total Occlusion Club. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10: 2135-2143.. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  73. Galassi AR, Werner GS, Boukhris M, et al. Percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions: 2019 consensus document from the EuroCTO Club. EuroIntervention. 2019; 15: 198-208. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  74. Galassi AR, Sianos G, Werner GS, et al. Euro CTO Club. Retrograde recanalization of chronic total occlusions in Europe: procedural, in-hospital, and long-term outcomes from the Multicenter ERCTO Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65: 2388-2400. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  75. Galassi AR, Sumitsuji S, Boukhris M, et al. Utility of intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions: an overview. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9: 1979-1991. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  76. Vo MN, Karmpaliotis D, Brilakis ES. "Move the cap" technique for ambiguous or impenetrable proximal cap of coronary total occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 87: 742-748. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  77. Karmpaliotis D, Lembo N, Kalynych A, et al. Development of a high-volume, multiple-operator program for percutaneous chronic total coronary occlusion revascularization: procedural, clinical, and cost-utilization outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 82: 1-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  78. Brilakis ES, Banerjee S, Karmpaliotis D, et al. Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8: 245-253. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  79. Kinnaird T, Gallagher S, Cockburn J, et al.; British Cardiovascular Intervention Society and the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research. Procedural success and outcomes with increasing use of enabling strategies for chronic total occlusion intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11: e006436. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  80. Habara M, Tsuchikane E, Muramatsu T, et al.; Retrograde Summit Investigators. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion outcome according to operator experience from the Japanese retrograde summit registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 87: 1027-1035. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  81. Konstantinidis NV, Werner GS, Deftereos S, et al.; Euro CTO Club. Temporal trends in chronic total occlusion interventions in Europe. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11: e006229. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  82. Wu EB, Tsuchikane E. The inherent catastrophic traps in retrograde CTO PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 91: 1101-1109. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  83. Okamura A, Yamane M, Muto M, et al. Complications during retrograde approach for chronic coronary total occlusion: sub-analysis of Japanese multicenter registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 88: 7-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  84. Kotsia AP, Brilakis ES, Karmpaliotis D. Thrombin injection for sealing epicardial collateral perforation during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions. J Invasive Cardiol. 2014; 26: E124-E126. Go to PubMed...
  85. Karatasakis A, Akhtar YN, Brilakis ES. Distal coronary perforation in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the importance of early treatment. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016; 17: 412-417. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  86. Kim BK, Shin DH, Hong MK, et al.; CTO-IVUS Study Investigators. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided chronic total occlusion intervention with zotarolimus-eluting versus biolimus-eluting stent implantation: randomized study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8: e002592. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  87. Tian NL, Gami SK, Ye F, et al. Angiographic and clinical comparisons of intravascular ultrasound - versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with chronic total occlusion lesions: two-year results from a randomised AIR-CTO study. EuroIntervention. 2015; 10: 1409-1417. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  88. Karacsonyi J, Alaswad K, Jaffer FA, et al. Use of intravascular imaging during chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from a contemporary multicenter registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5: e003890. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  89. Zhang J, Gao X, Kan J, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided implantation of drug-eluting stent in all-comers: the ULTIMATE trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72: 3126-3137. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  90. Zivelonghi C, Suttorp MJ, Teeuwen K, et al. Clinical implications of distal vessel stenosis after successful coronary chronic total occlusion recanalization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11: 2343-2345. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.