Interv Akut Kardiol. 2013;12(4):215-218

The STREAM (Strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction) Study.

Karel Dvořák
Kardiologická ambulance

Fibrinolysis – alternative reperfusion strategy for STEMI

The STREAM study was open-label, prospective, randomized, international and multicenter trial. Ninety nine centers from 15 countries

participated in the study. Two therapeutic approaches were compared in patients with STEMI that had the first medical contact within 3

hours after symptom onset preferably in pre-hospital period, and that were unable to undergo a primary percutaneous coronary intervention

(PPCI) within 1 hour, but not longer interval than 3 hours. Patients were assigned in part to the PPCI group, with immediate transfer to

7/24 PCI center, and prehospital therapy was performed according to a guideline-based local practice or to the fibrinolytic therapy (FT)

group. This procedure consisted of bolus tenecteplase according to body weight, clopidogrel 300 mg orally, enoxaparin 30 mg i.v. with

following subcutaneous application and aspirin 75 – 325 mg. In patients over 75 years old i.v. doses of enoxaparin were left out and

clopidogrel dose was lowered to 75 mg. After the implementation of protocol addition the dose of tenecteplase in these old patients was

halved. Cases with insufficient effect of FT after 90 minuts (clinical signs, continuing elevation of ST segment, shock, hemodynamic and

rhythm instability) were immediately transported to PCI center and a “rescue” coronary angiography was performed, the others from FT

group underwent coronary angiography 6 to 24 hours after the first medical contact, and PPCI as needed. The primary endpoint included

death, shock, congestive heart failure or reinfarction up to 30 days. Altogether 1915 patients were enrolled from March 2008 to July 2012.

The primary endpoint occurred in 116 of 939 patients (12.4%) in FT group, and 135 of 943 patients (14.3%) in PPCI group. The difference

between groups was not significant (0.68 vs. 1.09, P = 0.21). In the FT group the “rescue” coronary angiography was performed in 36.3%,

and in this group significantly more intracranial hemorrhage occurred (1.0% in FT group vs. 0.2 in PPCI group, P = 0.02). The FT with timely

coronary angiography resulted in effective alternative reperfusion strategy in patients with early STEMI, when presumed transfer to PCI

center could take several hours. A disadvantage is a comparatively high danger of intracranial hemorrhage particularly in patients over

75 years old, where it is likely the best to administer a half of tenecteplase dose.

Keywords: STEMI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention, pharmacoinvasive strategy, fibrinolytic therapy

Published: December 1, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dvořák K. The STREAM (Strategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction) Study. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2013;12(4):215-218.
Download citation

References

  1. Keelley EC, Boura J, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus thrombolytic fo acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative rewiew of 23 randomised trials. lancet 2003;361:13-20. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Zijlstra F, Patel A, Jones T, et al. Clinical charakteristic outcome of patients early (2h), intermediate (2-4h) and late (4h), presentation treated by primary coronary angioplastyr thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 550-557. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Widimsky P, Budešinský T, Voráč R, et al. Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final result of the randomized national multicentre trial-PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 94-104. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Elis SG, Tendera M, De Belder MA, et al. Facilitated PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. N Emgland J Med 2008; 358: 2205-2215. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Danchin N, Coste P, Fsrrieres J, et al. Comparision of thrombolysis Followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary interventionwith primary, coronary intervention for ST segmen elevation acute myocardial infarction. Data from the French rdgistry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI). Circulation 2008; 118: 268-276. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Bonnefay E, Lapostolle F, Leizorovicz A, et al. Comparison of angioplasty and prehospital thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (CAPTIM) study group. Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction a randomized study. Lancet 2002; 360: 825-859. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Armstrong PW and the WEST steering committee. A comparison, of pharmacologic therapy with/without timely coronary intervention vs primary percutaneous intervention early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the WEST (which early ST-elevation myocardial infarction therapy study) Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 1530-1538. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2569-2619.
  9. Danchin N, Durant E, Vlanchart D. Pre-hospital thrombolysis in perspective. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 2835-2842. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Larson DM, Duval S, Sharkey SW, et al. Safety and efficacy of a pharmaco-invasve reperfusion strategy in rural ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with expected delays due to long-distance transfers Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 1232-1240. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Widimsky P, Winjs W, Fajadet J, et al. Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardiel infarction in Europe: description of current situation in 30 countries. Eur Heart J 2010; 31 :943-957. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Armstrong PW, Gershlick A, Goldstein P, et al. The Strategic reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infartion (STREAM) study.Am Heart J 2010; 160: 30-35. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Armstrong PW, Gershlick AH, Goldstein P, et al. for the STREAM investigative team. Fibrinolysis or primary PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1368-1388. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Assessemt of the safety and efficacy of new treatment strategy with percutaneous coronary intervention (ASSENT-PCI) investigator. Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial. Lancet 2006; 367: 569-578.
  15. Bhatt DL. Timely PCI for for STEMI-still the treatmant of choice. New Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1446-1447. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Bonnefoy E, Steg PG, Chabaut E, et al. Comparision of primary angioplasty and pre-hospital fibrinolysisi in acute myocardial inarction (CAPTIM) trial: a 5-year follow-up. Eur Heart J 2009; 1598-1606. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.