Interv Akut Kardiol. 2013;12(2):59-64

Increased radiation exposure in transradial approach. A real drawback or an obsolete problem?

Jan Škvařil1, Pavel Sedloň1, Miroslav Černohous1, Patrik Jarkovský1, Radka Kočková2
1 Kardiologické oddělení ÚVN a VFN Praha
2 Klinika kardiologie IKEM Praha

Objective: Beside many advantages of a transradial approach (TRA), the controversy concerning possibly increased radiation exposure

remains. The objective of the study was to compare left radial, right radial (TRA-R) and femoral (TFA) approaches concerning total time,

fluoroscopy time, radiation exposure of patients as well as of physicians.

Material and methods: 456 patients were prospectively randomized to TRA-L (154), TRA-R (159) or TFA (143). Procedural time, fluoroscopy

time, dose-area product (DAP) as patient´s exposure and physician´s equivalent dose, measured with personal electronic dosemeter,

were evaluated. Separately for diagnostic procedures and interventions.

Results: TRA-L and TFA diagnostic procedures were performed in the same fluoroscopy time (3.56 ± 2.6 min vs. 3.13 ± 2.56 min). The value

for TRA-R was longer (4.9 ± 6.53). There was no difference in PCI. Similarly, no differences between TFA, TRA-R and TRA-L were found in

patients´ exposure either in diagnostics (24.49 ± 25.4 Gy.cm2 vs. 27.46 ± 28.86 Gy.cm2 vs. 27.30 ± 19.59 Gy.cm2, p = 0.210), or PCIs (35.18

± 63.35 Gy.cm2 vs. 45.75 ± 70.11 Gy.cm2 vs. 47.05 ± 48.66 Gy.cm2, p = 0.990). The physician´s exposure was then the lowest in TRA-L both

in diagnostics (19.01 ± 23.85 μSv vs. 22.21 ± 29.84 μSv vs. 14.95 ± 17.01 μSv, p < 0.001) and in interventions (26.39 ± 59.25 μSv vs. 36.76

± 48.93 μSv vs. 15.30 ± 28.13 μSv, p = 0.004). Patient´s exposure was more dependent on pateint´s size (rs = 0.59) than the exposure of

physician (rs = 0.27). A good correlation between DAP and physician´s dose (rs = 0.64–0.85) was found.

Conclusion: Radial access performed routinely with sufficient learning curve and in view of radiation safety it is not associated with

increased radiation exposure either of patients or of performing physicians. Established TRA-L provides the optimal results.

Keywords: heart catheterisation, transradial approach, radiation exposure

Published: March 1, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Škvařil J, Sedloň P, Černohous M, Jarkovský P, Kočková R. Increased radiation exposure in transradial approach. A real drawback or an obsolete problem? Interv Akut Kardiol. 2013;12(2):59-64.
Download citation

References

  1. Radner S. Thoracal aortography by catheterization from the radial artery; preliminary report of a new technique. Acta Radiol 1948; 29: 178-180. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989; 16: 3-17. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Transradial artery Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation: Results of a single-center feasibility study. Am Heart J 1995; 130: 14-21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, de Melker E. Transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1995; 0129: 01-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. Outpatient coronary stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 323-327. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Doyle BJ, Rihal CS, Gastineau DA, Holmes DR, Jr. Bleeding, blood transfusion, and increased mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for contemporary practice. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53: 2019-2027. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Rao SV, Eikelboom JA, Granger CB, Harrington RA, Califf RM, Bassand JP. Bleeding and blood transfusion issues in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 1193-1204. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart 2008; 94: 1019-1025. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Slagboom T, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, van der Wieken R. Outpatient coronary angioplasty: Feasible and safe. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64: 421-427. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Bertrand OF, Larose E, De Larochelliere R, et al. Outpatient percutaneous coronary intervention: Ready for prime time? Can J Cardiol 2007; 23(Suppl B): 58B-66B. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Roussanov O, Wilson SJ, Henley K, et al. Cost effectiveness of radial versus femoral artery approach to diagnostic cardiac catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol 2007; 19: 349-353. Go to PubMed...
  12. Amoroso G, Sarti M, Bellucci R, et al. Clinical and procedural predictors of nurse workload during and after invasive coronary procedures: The potential benefit of a systemic transradial access. Eur J of Cardiovasc Nurse 2005; 4: 234-241. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Louvard Y, Benamer H, Garot P, Hildick-Smith D, et al. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study). Am J Cardiol 94: 1177-1180. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Hildick-Smith DJR, Walsh JT, Lowe MT, Petch MC. Coronary angiography in the fully anticoagulated patient: the transradial route is successful and safe. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003; 58: 8-10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Sanmartín M, Pereira B, Rúa R, Vázquez S, Hervert F, Baz JA, I?iguez A. Safety of diagnostic transradial catheterization in patients undergoing long-term anticoagulation with coumarin derivatives. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007; 60(9): 988-991. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Cantor WJ, Puley G, Natarajan MK, et al. Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction-The RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial. Am Heart J 2005; 150: 543-549. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Jolly S, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemelä M, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Gao P, Afzal R, Joyner CD, Chrolavicius S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 1409-1420. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Sciahbasi A, Pristipino C, Ambrosio G, et al. Arterial accesssiterelated outcomes of patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures for acute coronary syndromes (from the ComPaRison of Early Invasive and Conservative Treatment in Patients With Non-ST-ElevatiOn Acute Coronary Syndromes [PRESTO-ACS] Vascular Substudy). Am J Cardiol 2009; 103: 796-800. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Joyal D, Bertrand OF, Rinfret S, et al. Meta-analysis of ten trials on the effectiveness of the radial versus the femoral approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2011; Dec 21. [Epub ahead of print].
  20. Stella PR, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997; 40: 156-158. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Pancholy SB, Coppola J, Patel T, Roke-Thomas M. Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 72: 335-340. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Vano E. Patient and staff radiation doses should be known by interventional cardiologists. Eurointerv 2008; 3: 541-542. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 349-356. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009; 157: 132-140. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Wholey MH. Clinical dosimetry during the angiographic examination: Comments on coronary arteriography. Circulation 1974; 50: 627-631. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Mann JT, Cubeddu G, Arrowood M. Operator Radiation Exposure in PTCA: Comparison of radial and femoral approaches. J Invasive Cardiol 1996; 8(Suppl D): 22D-25D. Go to PubMed...
  27. Lange HW, von Boetticher H. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67: 12-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Brasselet C, Blanpain T, Tassan-Mangina S, et al. Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 63-70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Bertrand OF, Arsenault J, Mongrain R. Operator vs. patient radiation exposure in transradial and transfemoral coronary interventions. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 2577-2578. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Hamon M, Sourganis A. Radiation exposure and vascular access site. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 954. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Santas E, Bodi V, Sanchis J, et al. The left radial approach in daily practice. A randomized study comparing femoral and right and left radial approaches. Rev Esp Cardiol 2009; 62(5): 482-490. Go to original source...
  32. Sciahbasi A, Romagnoli E, Trani C, Burzotta F, Sarandrea A, Summaria F, Patrizi R, Rao S, Lioy E. Operator radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary procedures through the left or right radial approach: The TALENT dosimetric substudy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 226-231. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Norgaz T, Gorgulu S, Dagdelen S. A randomized study comparing the effectiveness of right and left radial approach for coronary angiography.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Feb 14. [Epub ahead of print]. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Hamon M, Nolan J. Should radial artery access be the, ,gold standard" for PCI? Heart 2008; 94: 1530-1532. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Bhatia GS, Ratib K, Lo TS, Hamon M, Nolan J. Transradial cardiac procedures and increased radiation exposure: is it a real phenomenon? Heart 2009; 95: 1879-1880. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.