Interv Akut Kardiol 2011; 10(5-6): 235-238
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the dominant reperfusion strategy for the treatment of STEMI in most developed countries.
Result of reperfusion therapy, either primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or thrombolytic therapy (TT), is the better
the earlier is achieved restoration of a flow in the thrombotic coronary artery. Findings of some registries and studies demonstrated that
mortality of patients with PPCI or TT is practically the same when first medical contact was shorter than 3 hours after signs of myocardial
infarction. Median time of PPCI delay in comparison with TT is at condition of good organisation at PCI centres at least 60 minutes, which is
particularly significant in the first two or three hours after rise of signs. Only one and rather small study CAPTIM compared PPCI a TT. This
study demonstrated only nonsignificant decrease of mortality in TT group. The principles of farmaco-invasive strategy were here applied.
That included TT, aspirin, clopidogrel and heparin, direct transportation to PCI centre. Now we are expecting the results of the STREAM
study, where the farmaco-invasive strategy (TT, aspirin, clopidogrel and direct transportation to PCI centres) and direct PPCI without TT will
be compared in patients up to three hours after rise of STEMI symptoms.
Published: November 1, 2011 Show citation