Interv Akut Kardiol. 2011;10(1):14-16
Bare metal stents (BMS) have solved the problem of acute or abrupt coronary artery occlusion during percutaneous coronary interventions;
however, a more pronounced intimal hyperplasia was documented following their implantation compared to plain balloon angioplasty
and restenosis was reported in 20–30 % of patients. Drug-eluting stents (DES) substantially reduced the restenosis rate, but brought about
another problem – late and very late stent thrombosis. Titanium stent which, according to preclinical studies, stimulates the growth of
endothelial cells, reduces platelet and fibrinogen adhesion and fibrin deposition and reduces intimal hyperplasia is a possible alternative
to both BMS and DES. Compared to the first-generation BMS and DES, the titanium stent carries a lower risk of restenosis, clinical
events as well as of acute myocardial infarction and requires only short-term dual antiplatelet therapy. In this review article the results
of published studies as well as our own experience with the titanium stent are presented and discussed.
Published: March 12, 2011 Show citation