Interv Akut Kardiol. 2011;10(1):14-16

Titanium stent - a new era in interventional cardiology ?

Miloslav Brtko
Kardiocentrum, Kardiochirurgická klinika LF UK a FN, Hradec Králové

Bare metal stents (BMS) have solved the problem of acute or abrupt coronary artery occlusion during percutaneous coronary interventions;

however, a more pronounced intimal hyperplasia was documented following their implantation compared to plain balloon angioplasty

and restenosis was reported in 20–30 % of patients. Drug-eluting stents (DES) substantially reduced the restenosis rate, but brought about

another problem – late and very late stent thrombosis. Titanium stent which, according to preclinical studies, stimulates the growth of

endothelial cells, reduces platelet and fibrinogen adhesion and fibrin deposition and reduces intimal hyperplasia is a possible alternative

to both BMS and DES. Compared to the first-generation BMS and DES, the titanium stent carries a lower risk of restenosis, clinical

events as well as of acute myocardial infarction and requires only short-term dual antiplatelet therapy. In this review article the results

of published studies as well as our own experience with the titanium stent are presented and discussed.

Keywords: titanium stent, bare metal stents, drug-eluting stents, restenosis

Published: March 12, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Brtko M. Titanium stent - a new era in interventional cardiology ? Interv Akut Kardiol. 2011;10(1):14-16.
Download citation

References

  1. Kastrati A, Hall D, Schömig A. Long-term outcome after coronary stenting. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 2000; 1: 48-54. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Gershlick AH. Role ofstenting in coronary revascularization. Heart 2001; 86: 104-112. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Koster R, Vieluf D, Kiehn M, et al. Nickel and molybdenum contact allergies in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis. Lancet 2000; 356: 1895-1897. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Kaiser C, Brunner-La Rocca HP, et al. Incremental cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents compared with a thirdgeneration bare-metal stent in a real-world setting: Randomised Basel Stent Kosten Effektivitats Trial (BASKET). Lancet 2005; 366: 921-929. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kastrati A, Schömig A, Dirschinger J, et al. Increased risc of restenosis after placement of gold-coated stents: results of a randomized trial comparing gold-coated with uncoated steel stents in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 2000; 101: 2478-2483. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. vomDahl J, Haager PK, Grube E, et al. Effects of goldcoating of coronary stents on neointimal proliferation following stent implantation. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 801-805. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Park SJ, Lee CW, Hong MK, et al. Comparison of gold-coated NIR stents with uncoated NIR stents in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 872-875. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Ong ATL, McFadden EP, Regar E, et al. Late Angiographic Stent Thrombosis (LAST) events with drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 2088-2092. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Iakovou I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. JAMA 2005; 293: 2126-2130. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Windecker S, Mayer I, De Pasquale G, et al. Stent coating with titanium-nitride-oxide for reduction of neointimal hyperplasia. Circulation 2001; 104: 928-933. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Maitz MF, Pham MT, Wieser E, Tsyganov I. Blood compatibility of titanium oxides with various crystal structure and element doping. J Biomater Appl 2003; 17: 303-319. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Zhang F, Zheng Z, Chen Y, et al. In vivo investigation of blood compatibility of titanium oxide films. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 42: 128-133. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Mosseri M, Miller H, Tamari I, et al. The Titanium-NO Stent: results of a multicenter registry. Euro Intervention 2006; 2: 192-196.
  14. Valdesuso R, Karjalainen P, García J, et al. The EXTREME registry: titanium-nitride-oxide coated stents in small coronary arteries. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76: 281-287. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Windecker S, Simon R, Lins M, et al. Randomized comparison of a titanium-nitride oxide coated stent with a stainless steel stent for coronary revascularization. The TINOX trial. Circulation 2005; 111: 2617-2622. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Moschovitis A, Simon R, Seidenstücker A, et al. Randomised comparison of titanium-nitride-oxide coated stents with bare metal stents: five year follow-up of the TiNOX trial. Euro Intervention 2010; 6: 63-68. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Karjalainen PP, Biancari F, Ylitalo A, et al. Pooled analysis of trials comparing titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stents with paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary stenting. J Invasive Cardiol 2010; 22: 322-326. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Karjalainen PP, Ylitalo A, Airaksinen JK, Nammas W. Fiveyear clinical outcome of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stent implantation in a real-world population: a comparison with paclitaxel-eluting stents: the PORI registry. J Interv Cardiol 2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2010.00601.x. [Epub ahead of print]. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Karjalainen PP, Ylitalo A, Niemelä M, et al. Two-year followup after percutaneous coronary intervention with titaniumnitride-oxide-coated stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction. Ann Med 2009; 41: 599-607. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.