Interv Akut Kardiol. 2006;5(1):19-22

CATHETER-BASED THERAPY FOR IN-STENT RESTENOSIS

Tereza Pučelíková, Jiří Kettner
Klinika kardiologie, Institut klinické a experimentální medicíny, Praha

Stent implantation during percutaneous coronary intervention has dramatically improved the clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease. The main limitations of this method remain the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in some patients and the high recurrence rates after reintervention. It is not surprising that mechanical strategies have not improved long-term outcomes of patients treated for ISR since they do not address the main cause of ISR, ie, neointimal hyperplasia. Only two methods, suppressing neointima formation, have been proved to reduce the recurrence rates after catheterization treatment – intracoronary brachytherapy and drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Head-to-head comparison favoured DES implantation in this clinical setting. DES implantation is the treatment of choice for bare metal stent ISR and should be performed in all patients if technically possible and if stent underexpansion is excluded. The main limitation is the high cost of this treatment.

Keywords: coronary angiography, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, stents, coronary restenosi

Published: January 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pučelíková T, Kettner J. CATHETER-BASED THERAPY FOR IN-STENT RESTENOSIS. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2006;5(1):19-22.
Download citation

References

  1. Sigwart U. Puel J, Mirkovitch V, et al. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 701-706. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496-501. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 489-495. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Holmes DR Jr, Leon MB, Moses JW, et al. Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis. Circulation. 2004; 109: 634-640. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, et al. One-year clinical results with the slow-release, polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent: the TAXUS-IV trial. Circulation. 2004; 109: 1942-1947. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Hong MK, et al. Intravascular ultrasound to discern device-specific effects and mechanisms of restenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 18-22. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, et al. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 1999; 100: 1872-1878. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Moses JW, Moussa I, Kuntz RE, et al. Long-term efficacy of reintervention for sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis: the SIRIUS trial. Am J Cardiol. 2004; 94 Suppl 6A: 130E.
  9. Mehran R, Mintz GS, Popma JJ, et al. Mechanisms and results of balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 618-622. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. vom Dahl J, Dietz U, Haager PK, et al. Rotational atherectomy does not reduce recurrent in-stent restenosis: results of the angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy for treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis trial (ARTIST). Circulation 2002; 105: 583-588. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Alfonso F, Zueco J, Cequier A, et al. A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 796-805. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Suzuki T. Restenosis Reduction by Cutting Balloon Evaluation (REDUCE) II Trial. Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics, 2003.
  13. Sharma SK, Kini A, Mehran R, et al. Randomized trial of Rotational Atherectomy Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Diffuse In-stent Restenosis (ROSTER). Am Heart J. 2004; 147(1): 16-22. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Albierio R, Silber S, Di Mario C, et al. Cutting balloon versus conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: results of the restenosis cutting balloon evaluation trial (RESCUT). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 943-949. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, von Beckerath N, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent or paclitaxel-eluting stent vs. balloon angioplasty for prevention of recurrences in patients with coronary in-stent restenosis. JAMA 2005; 293: 165-171. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Shiran A, Mintz GS, Waksman R, et al. Early lumen loss after treatment of in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1998; 98: 200-203. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Morino Y, Limpijankit T, Honda Y, et al. Late vascular response to repeat stenting for in-stent restenosis with and without radiation: an intravascular ultrasound volumetric analysis. Circulation. 2002; 105: 2465-2488. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Cheneau E, Wu Z, Leborgne L, et al. Additional stenting promotes intimal proliferation and compromises the results of intravascular radiation therapy: an intravascular ultrasound study. Am Heart J. 2003; 146: 142-145. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Leon MB, Teirstein PS, Moses JW, et al. Localized intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy to inhibit the recurrence of restenosis after stenting. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 250-256. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Waksman R, White RL, Chan RC, et al. Intracoronary gamma-radiation therapy after angioplasty inhibits recurrence in patients with in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2165-2171. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Pompa JJ, Suntharalingam M, Lansky AJ, et al. Randomized trial of 90Sr/90Y beta-radiation versus placebo control for treatment of in-stent restenosis. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1090-1096. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Waksman R, Raizner AE, Yeung AC, et al. Use of localised intracoronary beta radiation in treatment of in-stent restenosis: the INHIBIT randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002; 359: 551-557. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Baierl V, Baumgartner S, Pöllinger, et al. Three-year clinical follow-up after Strontium-90/Yttrium-90 beta-irradiation for the treatment of in-stent coronary restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 1399-1393. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Tanabe K, Serruys W, Grube E, et al. TAXUS III trial: in-stent restenosis treated with stent-based delivery of paclitaxel incorporated in a slow-release polymer formulation. Circulation 2003; 107: 559-564. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Holmes DR, et al. SISR: sirolimus stent superior to intravascular brachyteraphy. presented at TCT conference 2005.
  26. Moses JW, Moussa I, Kuntz RE, et al. Long-term efficacy of reintervention for sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis: the SIRIUS trial. Am J Cardiol. 2004; 94 Suppl 6A: 130E.
  27. Lemos PA, van Mieghem CA, Arampatzis CA, et al. Post-sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis treated with repeat percutaneous intervention: late angiographic and clinical outcomes. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2500-2502. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Waksman R, Torguson R, Sabate M, et al. Intravascular brachytherapy for the treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis: the RESCUE registry. ACC 2005. Go to original source...
  29. Castagna MT, Mintz GS, Leiboff BO, et al. The contribution of "mechanical" problems to in-stent restenosis lesions. Am Heart J. 2001; 142: 970-974. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.