Interv Akut Kardiol. 2005;4(1):18-23

CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE VERSUS THALLIUM SCINTIGRAPHY IN THE DETECTION OF MYOCARDIAL VIABILITY. PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY

Miroslav Solař1, Jan Žižka2, Jiří Doležal3, Ludovít Klzo2, Jaroslav Tintěra4, Jaroslav Vižďa3, Jiří Ceral5, Pavel Žáček1, Vladimír Lonský1
1 Kardiochirurgická klinika LF UK a Kardiocentrum FN Hradec Králové
2 Klinika radiologie, FN Hradec Králové
3 Oddělení nukleární medicíny, FN Hradec Králové
4 Základna radiodiagnostiky a intervenční radiologie IKEM Praha
5 I. interní klinika Fakultní nemocnice v Hradci Králové

Background: The aim of study was to compare contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) to single-photon emission tomography using 201Thallium chloride (SPECT Tl) in the detection of myocardial viability.

Methods: Patients with chronic coronary artery disease and ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 45 % were included. CE-MRI was performed using Inversion Recovery Turbo FLASH (fast low-angle shot) sequence and 4-hours rest redistribution protocol was used for SPECT Tl.

Results: Total number of 40 patients was included and 32 of them underwent follow-up exam after revascularization. The concordance in the viability assessment between the both methods was noted in 1 065 (78.3 %) segments, that resulted in moderate agreement only (kappa value 0.336). 96 SPECT Tl viable segments were non-viable on CE-MR and 199 SPECT Tl non-viable segments were viable according to CE-MR. The EF increased by 5.6 % (from 33.6 to 39.2) after revascularization, but the relation between the amount of dysfunctional viable myocardium and change of EF after revascularization was very weak and not statistically significant in both methods studied.

Conclusion: Moderate agreement in the myocardial viability assessment between CE-MRI and SPECT Tl was observed. We did not prove the usefulness of any of the methods studied for the prediction of improvement of EF after revascularization.

Keywords: Key words: magnetic resonance imaging, ischemic cardiomyopathy, myocardial viability, SPECT Thallium scintigraphy.

Published: January 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Solař M, Žižka J, Doležal J, Klzo L, Tintěra J, Vižďa J, et al.. CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE VERSUS THALLIUM SCINTIGRAPHY IN THE DETECTION OF MYOCARDIAL VIABILITY. PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2005;4(1):18-23.
Download citation

References

  1. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina-summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41(1):159-68. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Wijns W, Vatner SF, Camici PG. Hibernating myocardium. N Engl J Med 1998;339(3):173-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. Prognostic utility of myocardial viability assessment. Am J Cardiol 1999;83(5):696-702, A7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Allman KC, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R et al. Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39(7):1151-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999;100(19):1992-2002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000;343(20):1445-53. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 2003;361(9355):374-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Nelson C, McCrohon J, Khafagi F et al. Impact of scar thickness on the assessment of viability using dobutamine echocardiography and thallium single-photon emission computed tomography: a comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43(7):1248-56. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM et al. Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation 2002;105(2):162-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Bax JJ, Wijns W, Cornel JH et al. Accuracy of currently available techniques for prediction of functional recovery after revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction due to chronic coronary artery disease: comparison of pooled data. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30(6):1451-60. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Bax JJ, Schinkel AF, Boersma E et al. Extensive left ventricular remodeling does not allow viable myocardium to improve in left ventricular ejection fraction after revascularization and is associated with worse long-term prognosis. Circulation 2004;110(11 Suppl 1):II18-22. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105(4):539-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lima JA et al. Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction. Circulation 1996;94(12):3318-26. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Schuijf JD, Kaandorp TA, Lamb HJ et al. Quantification of myocardial infarct size and transmurality by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in men. Am J Cardiol 2004;94(3):284-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Bax JJ, Visser FC, Poldermans D et al. Relationship between preoperative viability and postoperative improvement in LVEF and heart failure symptoms. J Nucl Med 2001;42(1):79-86. Go to PubMed...
  16. Sandstede JJ. Assessment of myocardial viability by MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2003;13(1):52-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Dogruca Z, Kabasakal L, Yapar F et al. A comparison of Tl-201 stress-reinjection-prone SPECT and Tc-99m-sestamibi gated SPECT in the differentiation of inferior wall defects from artifacts. Nucl Med Commun 2000;21(8):719-27. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Gioia G, Milan E, Giubbini R et al. Prognostic value of tomographic rest-redistribution thallium 201 imaging in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. J Nucl Cardiol 1996;3(2):150-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Gioia, Giuseppe, Powers et al. Prognostic value of rest-redistribution tomographic thallium-201 imaging in ischemic cardiomyopathy. The American Journal of Cardiology 75(12), 759-762. 95.
  20. Christian TF, Miller TD, Hodge DO et al. An estimate of the prevalence of reversible left ventricular dysfunction in patients referred for coronary artery bypass surgery. J Nucl Cardiol 1997;4(2 Pt 1):140-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Ragosta M, Beller GA, Watson DD et al. Quantitative planar rest-redistribution 201Tl imaging in detection of myocardial viability and prediction of improvement in left ventricular function after coronary bypass surgery in patients with severely depressed left ventricular function. Circulation 1993;87(5):1630-41. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Meluzin J, Cigarroa CG, Brickner ME et al. Dobutamine echocardiography in predicting improvement in global left ventricular systolic function after coronary bypass or angioplasty in patients with healed myocardial infarcts. Am J Cardiol 1995;76(12):877-80. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Schwarz ER, Schoendube FA, Kostin S et al. Prolonged myocardial hibernation exacerbates cardiomyocyte degeneration and impairs recovery of function after revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31(5):1018-26. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Bax JJ, Schinkel AF, Boersma E et al. Early versus delayed revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and substantial viability: impact on outcome. Circulation 2003;108 Suppl 1:II39-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Bax JJ, Maddahi J, Poldermans D et al. Preoperative comparison of different noninvasive strategies for predicting improvement in left ventricular function after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 2003;92(1):1-4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.