Interv Akut Kardiol. 2003;2(3):137-143

Aortic stenosis might be associated with low transvalvular gradient when transvalvular flow is diminished

David Horák1, Ivana Zvánovcová1, Petr Hájek2, Vladimír Hraboš1, Martin Mates2, Jana Popelová2, Přemysl Šváb2, Jan Vojáček3,2, Karel Hlaváček4
1 Kardiologické oddělení, Krajská nemocnice Liberec
2 Kardiocentrum dospělých, oddělení invazivní kardiologie interní kliniky 2. LF UK a FN Motol, Praha
3 I. interní klinika Fakultní nemocnice v Hradci Králové
4 Kardiologie na Bulovce s. r. o., Praha

Vast majority of patients in this group are patients with left ventricular dysfunction. This this condition is coupled with several potential difficulties: 1. difficulties with precise quantification of stenosis grade and its differentiation from so called pseudostenosis: 2. second important question is which patient will profit from operative approach.

Useful may be comparison of measurement in basic state versus state with measurement performed under augmented flow. The most common way is dobutamine stress echocardiography. It is useful for distinguishing true stenosis from pseudostenosis as well as for assessment of contractile reserve. Indeed, we are still lacking precise and comprehensive guidelines for treatment of patients with low flow aortic stenosis. So far, it seems, that patients with tight aortic stenosis, left ventricular dysfunction in which contractile reserve of left ventricle is present are those who will profit from aortic valve replacement.

Keywords: low flow aortic, stenosis, LV dysfunction, pseudostenosis, afterload mismatch.

Published: December 31, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Horák D, Zvánovcová I, Hájek P, Hraboš V, Mates M, Popelová J, et al.. Aortic stenosis might be associated with low transvalvular gradient when transvalvular flow is diminished. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2003;2(3):137-143.
Download citation

References

  1. Otto Catherine M. Textbook of Clinical Echocardiography, WB. Saunders Company 2000.
  2. Veselka Josef, et al. Získané chlopenní vady srdce. Medcor Publishing, 2000.
  3. Kern J Morton, Hemodynamic Rounds, 2nd edition, Willey-Liss.
  4. Pereira J j, Lauer M s, Bashir M, et al. Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis With Low Transvalvular Gradients; JACC Vol 39. No 8, 2002, April 17, 2002: 1356-1363. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Carabello BA, Ventricular Function in Aortic stenosis: How Low Can You Go?, JACC JACC Vol 39. No 8, 2002, April 17, 2002: 1364-1365. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Schammenthal E, et al, Dobutamine echocardiography in patients withaortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: Predicting outcome as a function of management strategy. Chest 2001 Jun 119 (6): 1766-1777. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Brogan C, et al. Prognosis after valve replacement in patients ith severe aortic stenosis and a lo transvalvular pressure gradient. JACC 1993; 21: 1657-1660. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Voelker, et al. Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke ork loss and Gorlin valve area for quantification of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model, Circulation 1995; 91: 1196-1204. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Connolly HM, et al. Severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction: result of aortic valve replacement in 52 patients. Circulation 2000; 101: 1940-1946. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Monin JL, et al. Aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction and low transvalvular pressure gradients: risk stratification by low dose dobutamine echocardiography. JACC 2001; 37: 2101-2107. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Burwash IG, et al. Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. Can J Cardiol 2000; 16: 985-992.
  12. Griffith MJ, et al. Inaccuracies usin aortic valve gradients alone to grade severity of aortic stenosis. Br Heart J 1989; 62: 372-378. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Grossman W, et al. Cardiac catheterization, Angiography and Intervention, Fourth edition, Lea & Febiger.
  14. Yang S, Bentivoglio L, From Cardiac Catheterization Dagta To Hemodynamic Parameters, F.A. Davis Company, 2nd edition.
  15. Hučín Bohumil. Dětská kardiochirurgie. Grada Publishing 2001.
  16. Ross J Jr, Afterload mismatch and preload reserve: A conceptual framework for the analysis of ventricular function. Prog Cardiovascular Dis 1976; 18: 255. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Burwash IG, et al. Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patiens with valvular aortic stenosis. Can J Cardiol 2000; 16: 985-992.
  18. Smucker ML, et al, Preoperative lefzt ventricular wall stress, ejection fraction, and aortic valve gradient as prognostic indicators in aortic valve stenosis. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989; 17: 133-143. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Voelker W, et al, Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area for quantification of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model. Circulation 1995; 91: 1196-204. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Cannon JD Jr et al, Aortic valve resistance as an adjunct to the Gorlin formula in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis in symptomatic patients. JACC 1992; 20:1517-1523. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Cannon SR, et.al. Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: A correction of the Gorlin formula. Circulation 71: 1170-1178. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Rifkin RD, Physiological bases of flow dependence of Gorlin formula valve area in aortic stenosis: analysis using an hydraulic model of pulsatilo flow. J Heart Valve Dis 2000; 9: 740-751. Go to PubMed...
  23. Blitz LR, Herrman HC, Hemodynamic assesment of patient with low-flow, low-gradient velvular stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 657-661. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Rahimtoola SH. Severe aortic stenosis with low gradient. Circulation 2000; 101: 1892-1894. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Gorlin R, Gorlin SG, Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac values and central circulatory shunts. Am Heart J 1951; 41: 1-29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Doporučené postupy České kardiologické společnosti, revize z roku 1999: Doporučené postupy pro diagnostiku a léčbu nemocných s chlopenní vadou v dospělosti.




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.