Interv Akut Kardiol. 2023;22(3):122-128 | DOI: 10.36290/kar.2022.032

Treatment options of in­‑stent restenosis: mini review

Rana Zhafira Amanda1, Natasha Anindhia Harsas2, Sidhi Laksono Purwowiyoto3, 4
1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Urip Sumoharjo Hospital, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Pertamina Central Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
3 Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Pertamina Central Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
4 Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr Hamka, Tangerang, Indonesia

In­‑stent restenosis (ISR) is the leading cause of the need for reintervention after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Lumen diameter reduction may occur due to early elastic return, vascular remodelling, or aggressive neointimal hyperplasia in the luminal surface of the stent. Recent data also suggest that a newly occurring atherosclerotic process called „neoatherosclerosis“ can play an essential role in the development of ISR. Numerous studies have shown a high incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) as a clinical manifestation of ISR and its association with increased mortality and morbidity. Stent improvements, novel drug regimens, and technological advances have expanded the scope of treatment for ISR. Intracoronary imaging is also beneficial in guiding the intervention. The development of DES has been shown to reduce the incidence of ISR. However, target lesion revascularisation still exists and may occur within 5 years and 10 years (in 10% and 20%, respectively). Thus, it is necessary to consider the strategy to prevent and manage ISR optimally in order to avoid the possibility of another episode of restenosis. In this paper, we systematically reviewed ISR and its various treatments based on recent literature reviews.

Keywords: ISR, definition, incidence, classification, mechanism, clinical presentation, management

Received: August 8, 2022; Revised: November 23, 2022; Accepted: November 28, 2022; Published: November 7, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Amanda RZ, Anindhia Harsas N, Laksono Purwowiyoto S. Treatment options of in­‑stent restenosis: mini review. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2023;22(3):122-128. doi: 10.36290/kar.2022.032.
Download citation

References

  1. Shlofmitz E, Iantorno M, Waksman R. Restenosis of Drug­‑Eluting Stents: A New Classification System Based on Disease Mechanism to Guide Treatment and State­‑of­‑The­‑Art Review. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(8):1-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Pleva L, Kukla P, Hlinomaz O. Treatment of coronary in­‑stent restenosis: A systematic review. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018;15(2):173-84.
  3. Buccheri D, Piraino D, Andolina G, et al. Understanding and managing in­‑stent restenosis: A review of clinical data, from pathogenesis to treatment. J Thorac, DiS. 2016;8(10):E1150-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Her AY, Shin ES. Current management of in­‑stent restenosis. Korean Circ J. 2018;48(5):337-49. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Alfonso F, Coughlan JC, Giacoppo D, et al. Management of in­‑stent restenosis. EuroIntervention. 2022;18(2):e103-23. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, et al. Classification and Implications for Long­‑Term Outcome. Circulation. 1999;100:1872-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Shlofmitz E, Case BC, Chen Y, et al. Waksman In­‑Stent Restenosis Classification: A Mechanism­‑Based Approach to the Treatment of Restenosis. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med [Internet]. 2021;33:62-7. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553838921002761 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Dangas GD, Claessen BE, Caixeta A, et al. In­‑stent restenosis in the drug­‑eluting stent era. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(23):1897-907. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Alexandrescu D­‑M, Mitu O, Costache I, et al. Risk factors associated with intra‑stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(4):1-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. TsiGkas GGG, Karantalis V, Hahalis G, et al. Stent restenosis, pathophysiology and treatment options: A 2010 update. Hell J Cardiol. 2011;52(2):149-57.
  11. Kim MS, Dean LS. In­‑Stent Restenosis. Cardiovasc Ther. 2011;29(3):190-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Kuramitsu S, Shirai S, Ando K. Mechanism of in­‑stent restenosis after second­‑generation drug­‑eluting stents (DES): Is it different from bare­‑metal stents and first­‑generation DES? J Thorac, DiS. 2015;7(12):E599--E602.
  13. Nusca A, Viscusi MM, Piccirillo F, et al. In Stent Neo­‑Atherosclerosis: Pathophysiology, Clinical Implications, Prevention, and Therapeutic Approaches. Life. 2022;12(3):1-18. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Paramasivam G, Devasia T, Ubaid S, et al. In­‑stent restenosis of drug­‑eluting stents: clinical presentation and outcomes in a real­‑world scenario. Egypt Hear J. 2019;71(1). Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Magalhaes MA, Minha S, Chen F, et al. Clinical presentation and outcomes of coronary in­‑stent restenosis across 3-stent generations. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(6):768-76. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Figini F, Louvard Y, Sheiban I. Use of stent enhancement technique during percutaneous coronary intervention - A case series. Heart Int. 2019;13(1):28-31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Figini F, Louvard Y, Sheiban I. Stent Enhancement during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Current Role, Technical Tips and Case Examples. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med. 2020;21(1):137-43. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Lawton JS, Tamis­‑Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(2):e21-129.
  19. Akhtar M, Liu W. Use of intravascular ultrasound vs. optical coherence tomography for mechanism and patterns of in­‑stent restenosis among bare metal stents and drug eluting stents. J Thorac, DiS. 2016;8(1):E104-8.
  20. Habara M, Terashima M, Nasu K, et al. Morphological differences of tissue characteristics between early, late, and very late restenosis lesions after first generation drug­‑eluting stent implantation: An optical coherence tomography study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14(3):276-84. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Alfonso F, Pérez­‑Vizcayno MJ, Dutary J, et al. Implantation of a drug­‑eluting stent with a different drug (switch strategy) in patients with drug­‑eluting stent restenosis: Results from a prospective multicenter study (RIBS III [restenosis intra­‑stent: Balloon angioplasty versus drug­‑eluting stent]). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(7):728-37. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Giacoppo D, Alfonso F, Xu B, et al. Drug­‑Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug­‑Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Stent Restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(21):2664-78. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Siontis GCM, Stefanini GG, Mavridis D, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventional strategies for treatment of in­‑stent restenosis: a network meta­‑analysis. Lancet (London, England). 2015 Aug;386(9994):655-64. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Neumann FJ, Sousa­‑Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87-165. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Goel SS, Dilip Gajulapalli R, Athappan G, et al. Management of drug eluting stent in­‑stent restenosis: A systematic review and meta­‑analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87(6):1080-91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Wang G, Zhao Q, Chen Q, et al. Comparison of drug­‑eluting balloon with repeat drug­‑eluting stent for recurrent drug­‑eluting stent in­‑stent restenosis. Coron Artery, DiS. 2019;30(7):473-80. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Ali RM, Abdul Kader MASK, Wan Ahmad WA, et al. Treatment of Coronary Drug­‑Eluting Stent Restenosis by a Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel­‑Coated Balloon. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(6):558-66. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Ahmad WAW, Nuruddin AA, Abdul Kader MASK, et al. Treatment of Coronary De Novo Lesions by a Sirolimus- or Paclitaxel­‑Coated Balloon. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15(7):770-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Basavarajaiah S, Mitomo S, Nakamura S, et al. Long­‑term Outcome following Percutaneous Intervention of Intra­‑stent Coronary Occlusion and Evaluating the Different Treatment Modalities. IJC Hear Vasc [Internet]. 2021;34:100803. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100803 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Yang J, Mamuti W, Zhang F. Optimal interventional strategy for the treatment of coronary in­‑stent restenosis. J Thorac, DiS. 2015;7(10):1669-71.
  31. Aoki Y, De Gregorio J. Optimal Approach for Treating In­‑Stent Restenosis. Card Interv Today. 2018;12(3):49-52.
  32. Linares Vicente JA, Ruiz Arroyo JR, Lukic A, et al. 5-Year Results of Cutting or Scoring Balloon Before Drug­‑Eluting Balloon To Treat in­‑Stent Restenosis. REC Interv Cardiol (English Ed. 2022;4(June 2021):12-8. Go to original source...
  33. Kufner S, Joner M, Schneider S, et al. Neointimal Modification With Scoring Balloon and Efficacy of Drug­‑Coated Balloon Therapy in Patients With Restenosis in Drug­‑Eluting Coronary Stents: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(13):1332-40. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Alfonso F, Byrne RA, Rivero F, et al. Current treatment of in­‑stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(24):2659-73. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Moscarella E, Ielasi A, Granata F, et al. Long­‑term clinical outcomes after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation for the treatment of coronary in­‑stent restenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(4):1-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Bossard M, Attinger A, Wolfrum M, et al. Bioresorbable scaffold versus drug coated balloon for treatment of in­‑stent­‑restenosis - long­‑term outcomes of the randomized ABSORB­‑ISR trial. Eur Heart J. 2020;41. Go to original source...
  37. Alfonso F, Cuesta J, Pérez­‑Vizcayno MJ, et al. Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds for Patients With In­‑Stent Restenosis: The RIBS VI Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv [Internet]. 2017;10(18):1841-51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017. 06. 064 Go to original source...
  38. Andras A, Hansrani M, Stewart M, et al. Intravascular brachytherapy for peripheral vascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(1). Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Condado JA, Waksman R, Calderas C, et al. Two­‑year follow­‑up after intracoronary gamma radiation therapy. Cardiovasc Radiat Med. 1999;1(1):30-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Megaly M, Glogoza M, Xenogiannis I, et al. Outcomes of intravascular brachytherapy for recurrent drug­‑eluting in­‑stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97(1):32-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Megaly M, Glogoza M, Xenogiannis I, et al. Coronary Intravascular Brachytherapy for Recurrent Coronary Drug­‑Eluting Stent In­‑Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta­‑Analysis. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med. 2021;23(xxxx):28-35. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Varghese MJ, Bhatheja S, Baber U, et al. Intravascular brachytherapy for the management of repeated multimetal­‑layered drug­‑eluting coronary stent restenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(10):1-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Wong B, El­‑Jack S, Newcombe R, et al. Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy for Calcified Coronary Lesions: First Real­‑World Experience. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Mar;31(3):46-8.
  44. Morabito G, Tripolino C, Tassone EJ, et al. Case of Stent Under­‑Expansion due to Calcified Plaque Treated with Shockwave Lithoplasty. Cardiol. 2018;141(2):75-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  45. Gulati AS. Interventional Cardiology Coronary stent fracture and in­‑stent restenosis due to severe calcification treated with shockwave coronary intravascular lithotripsy with drug eluting balloon. 2022;189-93.
  46. Alfonso F, Bastante T, Antuña P, et al. Coronary Lithoplasty for the Treatment of Undilatable Calcified De Novo and In­‑Stent Restenosis Lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(5):497-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  47. Rawlins J, Din JN, Talwar S, et al. Coronary intervention with the excimer laser: Review of the technology and outcome data. Interv Cardiol Rev Res Resour. 2016;11(1):27-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. Fukui T. Management of acute aortic dissection and thoracic aortic rupture. J Intensive Care. 2018;6(1):1-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Gupta T, Weinreich M, Greenberg M, et al. Rotational atherectomy: A contemporary appraisal. Interv Cardiol Rev Res Resour. 2019;14(3):182-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  50. Abdel­‑Wahab M, Toelg R, Byrne RA, et al. High­‑speed rotational atherectomy versus modified balloons prior to drug­‑eluting stent implantation in severely calcified coronary lesions: The randomized prepare­‑CALC trial. Vol. 11, Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2018. Go to original source...
  51. Moustapha A, Assali AR, Sdringola S, et al. Percutaneous and surgical interventions for in­‑stent restenosis: Long­‑term outcomes and effect of diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(7):1877-82. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  52. Ţintoiu IC, Underwood MJ, Cook SP, et al. Coronary graft failure: State of the art. Coron Graft Fail State Art. 2016;1-758. Go to original source...
  53. Schömig A, Kastrati A, Wessely R. Prevention of restenosis by systemic drug therapy: Back to the future? Circulation. 2005;112(18):2759-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  54. Hausleiter J, Kastrati A, Mehilli J, et al. Randomized, double­‑blind, placebo­‑controlled trial of oral sirolimus for restenosis prevention in patients with in­‑stent restenosis: The oral sirolimus to inhibit recurrent in­‑stent stenosis (OSIRIS) trial. Circulation. 2004;110(7):790-5. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.