Interv Akut Kardiol. 2019;18(1):12-17 | DOI: 10.36290/kar.2019.002

Experience with recanalization of difficult chronic total occlusions

Vojtěch Novotný, Ivo Varvařovský, Tomáš Lazarák, Jan Matějka, Vladimír Rozsíval, David Vindiš, Milan Plíva
Kardiologické centrum AGEL, a. s., Pardubice

Aim: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery chronic total occlusion (CTO) has been a rapidly evolving branch
of interventional cardiology in recent years. The article presents our two-year experience with the development of a dedicated
CTO programme, while focusing on stratification of CTO difficulty depending on the J-CTO scoring system and the role of the
proctor in the learning curve.

Material and methods: The study cohort comprised consecutive patients who underwent PCI for CTO at our centre during the
period from 08/2016 to 10/2018. The following aspects were studied: the basic patient characteristics and technical aspects of the
procedure; the estimated difficulty depending on the J-CTO score; the proportions of various recanalization techniques; whether
or not a proctor was present during the procedure; and the rates of complications. Procedures with a J-CTO score ≥ 2 were graded
as difficult in consistency with the authors of the scoring system.

Results: The overall success rate of CTO PCI in the follow-up period was 84.4 %. The mean fluorocopic time per procedure was
30:17 minutes, the irradiation dose 2 660 mGy, and contrast medium consumption 262 ml. In successful procedures, the final
strategy that resulted in CTO recanalization was antegrade wire escalation in 65.6 %, retrograde dissection-reentry technique in
11.1 %, and retrograde wire escalation in 6.7 %. In one case, we succeeded with antegrade dissection-reentry technique. While the success rate of CTO PCI for J-CTO scores of 0-1 reached 94.9%, in difficult cases (J-CTO ≥ 2) the success rate was only
76.5%. Proctored procedures versus unproctored ones had a higher mean J-CTO score (2.3 vs. 1.7), a higher proportion of difficult
findings with a J-CTO ≥ 2 (66.7 % vs. 52.4 %), a higher percentage of retrograde procedures (55.6 % vs. 19.1 %), and a higher success
rate was achieved with them (92.6 % vs. 81.0 %).
Clinically severe complications occurred in 4.5%, and there was no periprocedural death or tamponade.

Conclusion: The present cohort represents the first two years of the CTO PCI learning curve showing that, when certain rules are
followed, it is possible to master the CTO PCI techniques and introduce them into normal operation of a catheterization room as
an effective and safe treatment method for patients with a specific, and not rare, type of coronary disease.

Keywords: CTO, chronic total occlusion, PCI, J-CTO score, proctor

Received: January 31, 2019; Accepted: February 15, 2019; Prepublished online: February 15, 2019; Published: March 8, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Novotný V, Varvařovský I, Lazarák T, Matějka J, Rozsíval V, Vindiš D, Plíva M. Experience with recanalization of difficult chronic total occlusions. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2019;18(1):12-17. doi: 10.36290/kar.2019.002.
Download citation

References

  1. Ivanhoe RJ, Weintraub WS, Douglas JS Jr, et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of chronic total occlusions. Primary success, restenosis, and long-term clinical follow-up. Circulation. 1992; 85(1): 106-115. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Suero JA, Marso SP, Jones PG, et al. Procedural Outcomes and long-term survival among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion in native coronary arteries: a 20-year experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38(2): 409-414. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Fefer P, Knudtson ML, Cheema AN, et al. Current perspectives on coronary chronic total occlusions: the Canadian Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusions Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59(11): 991-997. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5 year follow up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet. 2013; 381(9867): 629-638. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Yoshihiro M, Mitsuru A, Takeshi M, et al. Predicting Successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes: The J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) Score as a Difficulty Grading and Time Assessment Tool. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 4(2): 213-221. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Tajti P, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, et al. The hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: update from the PROGRESS CTO registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 11(14): 1325-1335. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Wilson WM, Walsh SJ, Yan AT, et al. Hybrid approach improves success of chronic total occlusion angioplasty. Heart. 2016; 102(18): 1486-1493. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Wilson WM, Walsh SJ, Bagnall A, et al. One-year outcomes after successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: The impact of dissection re-entry techniques. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 90(5): 703-712. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Werner GS, Martin-Yuste V, Hildick-Smith D, et al. A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(26): 2484-2493. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. R?munddal T, Hoebers LP, Henriques JP, et al. Prognostic Impact of chronic total occlusions: a report from SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9(15): 1535-1544. Go to PubMed...
  11. Khan MF, Wendel CS, Thai HM, Movahed MR. Effects of percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions on clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis comparing successful versus failed percutaneous intervention for chronic total occlusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 82(1): 95-107. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Henriques JP, Hoebers LP, R?munddal T, et al. Percutaneous intervention for concurrent chronic total occlusions in patients with STEMI: The EXPLORE Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68(15): 1622-1632. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Nombela-Franco L, Mitroi CD, Fernández-Lozano I, et al. Ventricular arrhythmias among implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients for primary prevention: impact of chronic total coronary occlusion (VACTO Primary Study). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5(1): 147-154. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Sharma V, Jadhav ST, Harcombe AA, et al. Impact of proctoring on success rates for percutaneous revascularisation of coronary chronic total occlusions. Open Heart. 2015; 2(1): e000228. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.