Interv Akut Kardiol. 2017;16(3):98-102 | DOI: 10.36290/kar.2017.030

Clinical outcome of patients treated with Absorb BVS: a single centre experience

Vojtěch Novotný, Milan Plíva, Tomáš Lazarák, Ivo Varvařovský, Jan Matějka, Vladimír Rozsíval, Petr Vojtíšek
Kardiologické centrum AGEL, a. s., Pardubice
Kardiologické oddělení, Interní klinika, Pardubická nemocnice, Nemocnice Pardubického kraje, a. s.

Aim: Absorb BVS™ (Abbott Vascular, Santa Monica, CA, USA) is the longest clinically available biodegradable stent (bioresorbablevascular scaffold, BVS). Despite promising results, pitfalls associated with treatment with this type of coronary implants haveemerged. This were the registries at first, some meta-analyses subsequently, the three-year results of the ABSORB II randomizedtrial in autumn 2016 that suggested an increased risk of thrombosis of the BVS stent compared with the newest-generation DES.The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a real population of patients with implanted BVS with an emphasison the incidence of definite/probable BVS thrombosis.

Patients and methods: The group consisted of consecutive patients who had received an Absorb BVS implant at our centrebetween 09/2013 and 12/2015. As of 30 April 2017, we retrospectively evaluated, in collaboration with the Institute of Health Informationand Statistics of the Czech Republic, the incidence of the device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) and that of thepatient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), with a particular focus on BVS thrombosis.

Results: During the follow-up period, a total of 210 Absorb BVSs were implanted in 178 patients during 196 PCIs. The medianfollow-up was 772 days. The indication for implantation was acute coronary syndrome in 47% of the cases and stable forms ofIHD in the remaining cases. At one year, the incidence of DOCE was 4.5%, with an estimated incidence at two years being 6.8% on the basis of Kaplan-Meier analysis. Death from cardiovascular causes occurred in 3.9% of the patients in the first year. A totalof six cases of definite and two cases of probable BVS thrombosis were encountered. The incidence of definite/probable BVSthrombosis thus reached 2.8% by 30 days and 3.9% by 1 year.

Conclusion: We present data on the use of Absorb BVS in real clinical practice of a single centre with a focus on BVS thrombosis.Our results confirm the concern about higher rates of this complication that, according to the data available so far, appears to bethe major and most serious problem in treating IHD with biodegradable stents of this type.

Keywords: absorbable stents, biodegradable stents, BRS, BVS, Absorb BVS, PCI, thrombosis

Published: November 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Novotný V, Plíva M, Lazarák T, Varvařovský I, Matějka J, Rozsíval V, Vojtíšek P. Clinical outcome of patients treated with Absorb BVS: a single centre experience. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2017;16(3):98-102. doi: 10.36290/kar.2017.030.
Download citation

References

  1. Novotný V, Varvařovský I, Matějka J, et al. Biodegradabilní stenty - kouzlo pomíjivého? Interv Akut Kardiol 2016; 15(3): 127-134. Go to original source...
  2. Stone GW, Rizvi A, NewmanW et al. Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1663-1674. Go to original source...
  3. Stefanini GG, Kalesan B, Serruys PW, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease (LEADERS): 4 year followup of a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2011; 378: 1940-1948. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Serruys PW, Chevalier B, Sotomi Y, et al. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus- -eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single- -blind, multicentre clinical trial. Lancet 2016; 388: 2479-2491. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Capodanno D, Gori T, Nef H, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in routine clinical practice: early and midterm outcomes from the European multicentre GHOST-EU registry. EuroIntervention. 2015; 10: 1144-1153. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Lipinski MJ, Escarcega RO, Baker NC, et al. Scaffold thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention with ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a systematic review and metaanalysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9: 12-24. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Wykrzykowska JJ, Kraak RP, Hofma SH. Bioresorbable Scaffolds versus Metallic Stents in Routine PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(24): 2319-2328. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007; 115(17): 2344-2351. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Byrne RA, Serruys PW, Baumbach A, et al. Report of a European Society of Cardiology-European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions task force on the evaluation of coronary stents in Europe: executive summary. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 2608-2620. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Tada T, Byrne RA, Simunovic I, et al. Risk of stent thrombosis among bare-metal stents, first-generation drug-eluting stents, and second-generation drug-eluting stents: results from a registry of 18,334 patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6: 1267-1274. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Raber L, Magro M, Stefanini GG, et al. Very late coronary stent thrombosis of a newer-generation everolimus-eluting stent compared with early-generation drug-eluting stents: a prospective cohort study. Circulation 2012; 125: 1110-1121. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Ellis SG, Kereiakes DJ, Metzger DC, et al. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 1905-1915. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Ellis SG. A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a Metallic everolimus-eluting stent III - ABSORB III. Prezentováno na: American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session (ACC 2017), 18. března 2017, Washington, DC, USA
  14. Puricel S, Cuculi F, Weissner M, et al. Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold Thrombosis: Multicenter Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Presentation, Mechanisms, and Predictors. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67(8): 921-31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Collet C, Asano T, Sotomi Y, et al. Early, late and very late incidence of bioresorbable scaffold thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and observational studies. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2017; 65(1): 32-51. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Karanasos A, Van Mieghem N, van Ditzhuijzen N, et al. Angiographic and optical coherence tomography insights into bioresorbable scaffold thrombosis: single-center experience. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8(5). Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.