Interv Akut Kardiol. 2015;14(3):124-128

The lower the better - the IMPROVE-IT study confirmed the importance of lowering cholesterol by ezetimibe

Jindřich ©pinar1, Lenka ©pinarová2, Jiří Vítovec2
1 Interní kardiologická klinika FN Brno, LF MU a ICRC Brno
2 Interní kardio-angiologická klinika, FN u sv. Anny, LF MU Brno

Background: The IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT) is evaluating the potential benefit

for reduction in major cardiovascular (CV) events from the addition of ezetimibe versus placebo to 40 mg/d of simvastatin therapy in

patients who present with acute coronary syndromes and have low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≤125 mg/dL.

Methods: Randomized double blind clinical trial in patiens with acute coronary syndrome and low cholesterol level. The simvastatin

monotherapy arm‘s LDL-C target was <70 mg/dL, the comparison arm was simvastatin + ezetimibe. Ezetimibe was assumed to further

lower LDL-C by 15 mg/dL and produce an estimated ~8 % to 9 % treatment effect. The primary composite end point was CV death, nonfatal

myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, rehospitalization for unstable angina (UA), and coronary revascularization (≥30 days

postrandomization). The targeted number of events was 5 250.

Results: 18 144 patients were enroled with either ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI, n = 5.192) or UA/non-ST-segment elevation MI (UA/NSTEMI,

n = 12 952) from October 2005 to July 2010. Primary endpoint occured in 2742 patients (34.7 %) treated with simvastatin in monotherapy and

in 2 572 patients (32.7 %) (p = 0.016) treated with combination. Compared to patients with coronary heart disease given the drug simvastatin

plus a placebo, those given both simvastatin and the non-statin drug, ezetimibe, had a 6.4 percent lower combined risk of subsequent heart

attack, stroke, cardiovascular death, rehospitalization for unstable angina and procedures to restore blood flow to the heart. Heart attacks

alone were reduced by 13 percent, and non-fatal stroke by 20 percent. Deaths from cardiovascular disease were statistically the same in

both groups. Patients were followed an average of approximately six years, and some as long as 8.5 years. Approximately 2 patients out of

every 100 patients treated for 7 years avoided a heart attack or stroke. (Number Needed to Treat (NNT) = 50/7years).

Conclusions: The study has shown a clear benefit from combination treatment with simvastatin and ezetimibe in patients with acute

coronary syndrome and low LDL-C.

Keywords: acute coronary syndrom, LDL cholesterol, combination therapy, ezetimibe

Published: October 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
©pinar J, ©pinarová L, Vítovec J. The lower the better - the IMPROVE-IT study confirmed the importance of lowering cholesterol by ezetimibe. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2015;14(3):124-128.
Download citation

References

  1. Canon CHP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP for the IMPROVE-IT Investigators: ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. NEJM 2015; 372: 2387-2397. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Jarcho JA, Keaney JF. Proof that lower is better - LDL Cholesterol and IMPROVE-IT. NEJM 20015.
  3. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005; 366: 1267-1278. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC, et al. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1563-1574. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T, et al. Niacin in patiens with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 2255-2267. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Landray MJ, Haynes R, Hopewell JC, et al. Effects of extended - release niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 203-212. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Nakajima N, Miyauchi K, Yokoyama T, et al. Effect of combination of ezetimibe and a statin on coronary plaque regression in patients with acute coronary syndrome ZEUS trial (eZEtimibe Ultrasound Study). IJC Metabolic & Endocrine 2014; 3: 8-13. Go to original source...
  8. Cannon CP, Giugliano RP, Blazing MA, et al. Rationale and design of IMPROVE-IT (IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial): comparison of ezetimbe/simvastatin versus simvastatin monotherapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. AmHeart J 2008; 156: 826-832. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Califf RM, Lokhnygina Y, Cannon CP et al. An update on the IMProved reduction of outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT) design. AmHeart J 2010; 159: 705-709. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Laufs U, Descamps OS, Catapano AL, Packard CJ. Understanding IMPROVE-IT and the cardinal role of LDL-C lowering in CVD prevention. European Heart Journal 2014; doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu228. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Giugliano RP, Canon CP, Blazing MA, et al. Benefit of Adding Ezetimibe to Statin Therapy on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Safety in Partients With vs Without Diabetes: the IPMROVE-IT Trial. Eur. Heart J; 2015: v tisku.




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.