Interv Akut Kardiol. 2015;14(1):26-30

Novel oral anticoagulants in treatment of acute coronary syndrome

Karel Kopřiva, Petr Neužil
Kardiologické oddělení, Nemocnice Na Homolce, Praha

Dual antiplatelet therapy is a standard component of secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In spite of this, there

remains an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiovascular death in these patients. Given the pathophysiological mechanism of

ACS, long-term anticoagulant therapy appears to be one of the options of how to further reduce this risk. Nowadays, novel oral anticoagulants

(NOACs) are routinely used to treat venous thrombosis as well as to prevent stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation. Several agents

of this group have been tested in clinical trials in the indication of secondary prevention in ACS. In all the trials performed, however, treatment

with NOACs was associated with an increase in the rate of bleeding complications, which limited the potential benefit of treatment in reducing

ischaemic events, and only a trial with rivaroxaban successfully completed phase III. This trial (ATLAS ACS 2–TIMI 51) with low-dose rivaroxaban

reported a favourable result in terms of the risk-benefit ratio of treatment with NOACs in ACS. The article presents an overview of performed

trials with NOACs in ACS and discusses the issue of implementation of NOACs in routine clinical practice in this indication.

Keywords: novel oral anticoagulants, acute coronary syndrome, antithrombotic therapy, secondary prevention

Published: April 20, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kopřiva K, Neužil P. Novel oral anticoagulants in treatment of acute coronary syndrome. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2015;14(1):26-30.
Download citation

References

  1. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(20): 2001-2015. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. PLATO Investigators. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(11): 1045-1057. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Merlini PA, Bauer KA, Oltrona L, et al. Persistent activation of coagulation mechanism in unstable angina and myocardial infarction. Circulation 1994; 90: 61-68. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Ardissino D, Merlini PA, Bauer KA, et al. Coagulation activation and long-term outcome in acute coronary syndromes. Blood. 2003; 102(8): 2731-2735. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Bassand JP. Novel oral anticoagulants in acute coronary syndrome: re-evaluating the thrombin hypothesis. EuroIntervention. 2014; 9(11): 1333-1341. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Coumadin Aspirin Reinfarction Study (CARS) Investigators. Randomised double-blind trial of fixed low-dose warfarin with aspirin after myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1997; 350(9075): 389-396. Go to original source...
  7. Fiore LD, Ezekowitz MD, Brophy MT, et al. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Trial comparing combined warfarin and aspirin with aspirin alone in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: primary results of the CHAMP study. Circulation 2002; 105: 557-563. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. van Es RF, Jonker JJ, Verheugt FW, Deckers JW, Grobbee DE. Antithrombotics in the Secondary Preventionof Events in Coronary Thrombosis-2 (ASPECT-2) Research Group. Aspirin and coumadin after acute coronary syndromes (the ASPECT-2 study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002; 360(9327): 109-113. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Brouwer MA, van den Bergh PJ, Aengevaeren WR, et al. Aspirin plus coumarin versus aspirin alone in the prevention of reocclusion after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction: results of the Antithrombotics in the Prevention of Reocclusion In Coronary Thrombolysis (APRICOT)-2 Trial. Circulation. 2002; 106(6): 659-665. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Hurlen M, Abdelnoor M, Smith P, Erikssen J, Arnesen H. Warfarin, aspirin, or both after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(13): 969-974. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Rothberg MB, Celestin C, Fiore LD, Lawler E, Cook JR. Warfarin plus aspirin after myocardial infarction or the acute coronary syndrome: meta-analysis with estimates of risk and benefit. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 241-250. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Andreotti F, Testa L, Biondi-Zoccai GG, et al. Aspirin plus warfarin compared to aspirin alone after acute coronary syndromes: an updated and comprehensive meta-analysis of 25,307 patients. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 519-526. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Wallentin L, Wilcox RG, Weaver WD, et al. Oral ximelagatran for secondary prophylaxis after myocardial infarction: the ESTEEM randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 362: 789-797. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Oldgren J, Budaj A, Granger CB, et al. Dabigatran vs. placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes on dual antiplatelet therapy: a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2781-2789. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Mega JL, Braunwald E, Mohanavelu S, et al. Rivaroxaban versus placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46): a randomised, double-blind, phase II trial. Lancet 2009; 374: 29-38 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Gibson CM, Mega JL, Burton P, et al. Rationale and design of the Anti-Xa therapy to lower cardiovascular events in addition to standard therapy in subjects with acute coronary syndrome-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 51 (ATLAS-ACS 2 TIMI 51) trial: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in subjects with acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J 2011; 161: 815-821. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, et al. Rivaroxaban in Patients with a Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 9-19. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Bayer HealthCare AG. Bayer's Xarelto(R) approved in the EU for secondary prevention after an acute coronary syndrome. 2013. Available at: http://press.healthcare.bayer.com/en/press/news-details-page.php 15050 2013-0292.
  19. Alexander JH, Becker RC, Bhatt DL, et al. Apixaban, an oral, direct, selective factor Xa inhibitor, in combination with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: results of the Apixaban for Prevention of Acute Ischemic and Safety Events (APPRAISE) trial. Circulation 2009; 119: 2877-2885. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Alexander JH, Lopes RD, James S, et al. Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 699-708. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Steg PG, Mehta SR, Jukema JW, et al. RUBY-1: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the safety and tolerability of the novel oral factor Xa inhibitor darexaban (YM150) following acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2541-2554. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Goldstein S, Bates E, Bhatt D, et al. Safety evaluation of the factor Xa inhibitor TAK-442 in subjects with acute coronary syndromes: phase 2 AXIOM-ACS trial results. Eur Heart J 2011; 32(Suppl.). abstr 2430.
  23. Sabatine MS, Antman EM, Widimsky P, et al. Otamixaban for the treatment of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (SEPIA-ACS1 TIMI 42): a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2009; 374: 787-795. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Steg PG, Mehta SR, Pollack CV Jr, et al. Anticoagulation with otamixaban and ischemic events in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the TAO randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013; 310(11): 1145-1155. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, et al. RE-LY Steering Committee and Investigators. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(12): 1139-1151. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, et al. Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 981-992. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 883-889. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C, et al. AVERROES Steering Committee and Investigators. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(9): 806-817. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. ROCKET AF Investigators. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(10): 883-891. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Komocsi A, Vorobcsuk A, Kehl D, et al. Use of new-generation oral anticoagulant agents in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172: 1537-1545. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Oldgren J, Wallentin L, Alexander JH, et al. New oral anticoagulants in addition to single or dual antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 1670-1680. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Laulicht B, Bakhru S, Jiang X, et al. Antidote for New Oral Anticoagulants: Mechanism of Action and Binding Specificity of PER977. Available at: http://www.perosphere.com/content/presentations/presentations.htm.
  33. ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study Exploring Two Strategies of Rivaroxaban (JNJ39039039; BAY-59-7939) and One of Oral Vitamin K Antagonist in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Who Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PIONEER AF-PCI). 2015. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01830543.
  34. ClinicalTrials.gov. Evaluation of Dual Therapy With Dabigatran vs. Triple Therapy With Warfarin in Patients With AF That Undergo a PCI With Stenting (REDUAL-PCI). 2015. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02164864.
  35. ClinicalTrials.gov. Triple vs. Dual Therapy. 2015. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02080858.
  36. Liew A, Darvish-Kazem S, Douketis JD. Is there a role for novel oral anticoagulants in patients with an acute coronary syndrome? A review of the clinical trials. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2013; 123(11): 617-622. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.