Interv Akut Kardiol. 2013;12(1):21-26
Previous randomized controlled trials have shown that the implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) provides a significant mortality reduction
in patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death. Despite technological advances, ICD patients still face a high incidence of therapies
delivered for causes other that life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. These unnecessary and inappropriate therapies, apart from being
painful and psychologically disturbing, may also result in fatal tachyarrhythmias. A high proportion of unnecessary and inappropriate shocks
is the result of a conservative and aggressive ICD programming. In this review we focus on recent evidences related to ICD programming
and reduction of unnecessary/inappropriate therapies and propose ways to rational and evidence-based ICD programming of ICDs that
can effectively reduce the number of unnecessary and/or inappropriate therapies and maximize benefit from this highly successful therapy.
Published: February 21, 2013 Show citation