Interv Akut Kardiol. 2009;8(6):307-310

Current trends in antiarrhythmic drug therapy of atrial fibrillation

Jan Bytešník
Klinika kardiologie, IKEM Praha

Despite the increasing number and promising results of catheter ablations and cardiac surgeries to manage atrial fibrillation (AF),

drug therapy currently remains the mainstay of treatment in various forms of AF. Two major strategies of this treatment are distinguished:

heart rate control and heart rhythm control. To restore and maintain the sinus rhythm, three antiarrhythmic drugs – propafenone,

sotalol, and flecainide – are mainly used in patients without structural cardiac disease; in those with cardiac damage, amiodarone is

preferred. New antiarrhythmic drugs are being developed such as selective ones for atrial myocardium, or amiodarone analogues with

a substantially lower risk of adverse effects (e. g. dronedarone). Attention is also paid to medications suppressing the development of

arrhythmogenic substrate in the atria (ACE inhibitors, sartans, statins etc.). The medications mentioned above are also administered to

enhance the effect of nonpharmacological treatment within the so-called hybrid therapy.

Keywords: antiarrhythmic medications, atrial fibrillation, antiremodelling therapy

Published: December 12, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bytešník J. Current trends in antiarrhythmic drug therapy of atrial fibrillation. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2009;8(6):307-310.
Download citation

References

  1. Noheria A, Kumar A, Wylie JV, Josephson ME. Catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 581-586. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. AFFIRM Investigators. A comparison of rate kontrol and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl. J Med 2002; 347: 1825-1833. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. AFFIRM Investigators. Quality of life in atrial fibrillation: the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. Am Heart J 2005; 149: 112-120. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Singh SN, Tang XC, Singh BN, et al., for the SAFE-T Investigators. Quality of life and exercise performance in patients in sinus rhythm versus persistent atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 721-730. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation - executive summary. Circulation 2006; 114: 700-752. Go to original source...
  6. Conway E, Musco S, Kowey PR. New horizons in antiarrhythmic therapy: will novel agents overcome current deficits? Am J Cardiol 2008; 102(Suppl.): 12H-19H. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Singh BN, Singh SN, Reda DJ, et al., for the SAFE-T Investigators. Amiodarone versus sotalol for atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1861-1872. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Waldo AL. A perspective on antiarrhythmic drug therapy to treat atrial fibrillation: There remains an unmet need. Am Heart J 2006; 151: 771-778. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Vassallo P, Trohman RG. Prescribing amiodarone: an evidence-based review of clinical Indications. JAMA 2007; 298: 1312-1322. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Ruangchira-Urai R, Colby TV, Klein J, et al. Nodular amiodarone lung disease. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32: 1654-1660. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Kharabsheh S, Abendroth CS, Kozak M. Fatal pulmonary toxicity occuring two weeks of initiation of amiodarone. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 896-898. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Olshansky B, Sami M, Rubin A, et al. Use of amiodarone for atrial fibrillation in patients with preexisting pulmonary disease in the AFFIRM Study. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 404-405. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Kanoupakis EM, Manios EG, Mavrakis HE, et al. Electrophysiological effects of carvedilol administration in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2008; 22: 169-176. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Kalifa J, Bernand M, Gout B, et al. Anti-arrhythmic effects of INa, Ikr, and combined Ikr-ICaL blockade in experimental model of acute stretch-related atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2007; 21: 47-53. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Craig M, Pratt MD, Singh SN, et al. Tle efficacy of azimilide in the treatment of atrial fibrillation in the presence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Results from the Azimilide Postinfarct Survival Evaluation (ALIVE) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1211-1216. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Connollly SJ, Schnell DJ, Page RL, et al. Dose-response relations of azimilide in the management of symptomatic, recurrent atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 974-979. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Lombardi F, Borggrefe M, Ruzylo W, et al. Azimilide vs placebo and sotalol for persistent atrial fibrilation: the A-COMET-II (Azimilide-CardiOversion MaintEnance Trial-II) trial. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 2224-2231. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Hohnloser SH, Crijns HJGM, van Eickels M, et al., for the ATHENA Investigators. Effect of dronedarone on cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009, 360: 668-678. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. De Haan S, Greiser M, Harks E, et al. AVE0118, blocker of the transient outward current (Ito) and ultrarapid delayed rectifier current (Ikur) fully restores atrial contractility after Cardioversion for atrial fibrillation in the goat. Circulation 2006; 114: 1234-1242. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Ford JW, Milnes JT. New drugs targeting the cardiac ultrarapid delayed-rectifier current (Ikur): rationale, pharmacology and evidence for potential therapeutic value. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2008; 52: 105-120. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Roy D, Pratt CM, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Vernakalant hydrochloride for rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation: a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Circulation 2008, 117: 1518-1525. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Guerra J, Everett T IV, Lee K, et al. Effects of the gap junction modifier rotigaptide (ZP 123) on atrial conduction and vulnerability to atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2006; 114: 110-118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Shiroshita-Takeshita A, Sakabe M, Haugan K, et al. Model-dependent effects of the gap junction conduction-enhancing antiarrhythmic peptide rotigaptide (ZP123) on experimental atrial fibrillation in dogs. Circulation 2007; 115: 310-318. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Murray KT, Mace LC, Yang Z. Nonantiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2007; 4(Supl. 3): S 88-S 90. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Casaclong-Verzosa G, Gersh BJ, Tsang TS. Structural and functional remodeling of the left atrium: clinical and therqpeutic implication for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51: 1-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Burstein B, Nattel S. Atrial structural remodeling as an antiarrhythmic target. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2008; 52: 4-10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Qi XY, Yeh YH, Xiao L, et al. Cellular signaling underlying atrial tachycardia remodeling of L-type calcium current. Circ Res 2008; 103: 845-854. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.