Interv Akut Kardiol. 2005;4(1):24-32

THE ROLE OF INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND IN THE CATHETERISATION LABORATORY

Tomáš Kovárník2, Jan Horák1,2, Michael Aschermann2
1 EuroMISE centrum - Kardio, Praha
2 II. interní klinika kardiologie a angiologie 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha

Intravascular ultrasound visualises not only coronary artery lumen but also the vessel wall and renders possibleprecise measurement of arteries and atherosclerotis plaque. The coronary angiography is essential method for assessment of coronary arteries, but has it’s limitations in the assessment of ostial lesion and the stenosis of the left main coronary artery. IVUS can elucidate correct diagnosis in case of uncertainty. Further role for IVUS is indication for coronary interventions (assessment of hemodynamic severity, selection of best diameter for catheters), assessment results after coronary intervention and diagnosis of periprocedural complication. The review comments a lot of studies about IVUS guided coronary interventions. The attention is focused on drug eluting stents (DES). The main indication and recommendation for DES implantation are discussed. Review summarizes main indications and contraindications of IVUS, safety of IVUS and main recommendation for it’s use.

Keywords: Key words: intravascular ultrasound, coronary angioplasty, stents, dissection.

Published: January 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kovárník T, Horák J, Aschermann M. THE ROLE OF INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND IN THE CATHETERISATION LABORATORY. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2005;4(1):24-32.
Download citation

References

  1. Pijls NH, de Bruyne B, Peels K et al, Measurement of Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess the Functional Severity of Coronary-Artery Stenoses. NEJM 1996; 334: 1703-1708). Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Topol EJ, Nissen SE.Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1995; 92: 2333-2342. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Vlodaver Z, Frech R, Van Tassel RA, et al. Correlation of the antemortem coronary angiogram and the postmortem specimen. Circulation 1973; 47: 162-169). Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins C, et al. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1371-1375. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Schoenhagen P, Ziada K, Vince G, et al. Arterial remodeling and coronary artery disease: The concept of, ,dilated" versus, ,obstructive" coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 297-306. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Schoenhagen P, Ziada K, Kapadia S, et al. Extent and direction of arterial remodeling in stable versus unstable coronary syndromes. An intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2000; 101: 598-603. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Kovárník T, Řezníček V, Nováčková K, et al. Srovnání výskytu pozitivní a negativní remodelace u pacientů se stabilní vs. nestabilní anginou pectoris. Vnitřní lékařství 2003; 49: 103-108. Go to PubMed...
  8. Mintz, G., Nissen, S. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Aquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS) J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1478-1492. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Hoyne J, Saito, Takayama T, et al. Clinical utility of negative contrast intravascular ultrasound to evaluate plaque morphology before and after coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 687-690. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Mintz GS, Painter J, Pichard A, et al. Atherosclerosis in Angiographically, ,Normal" Coronary Artery Reference Segments: An Intravascular Ultrasound Study With Clinical Correlation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 1479-1485. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Ge J, Erbel R, Gerbel T, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging of angiographically normal coronary arteries: a prospective study in vivo. Br Heart J 1994; 71: 572-578. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Maehara A, Mintz GS, Bui A, et al. Determinants of Angiographically Silent Stenoses in patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91: 1335-1338. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Kotani J, Mintz GS, Rai P, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of angiographic filling defects in native coronary arteries: Do they always contain thrombi? JACC 2004; 44: 2087-2089. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Kobayashi Y, De Gregorio J, Kobayashi N, et al. Stented segments length as an independent predictor of restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999: 34: 651-659. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Grewal J, Ganz P, Selwyn A, et al. Usefulness of intravascular ultrasound in preventing stenting of hazy areas adjacent to coronary stents and its support of support spot-stenting. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 1246-1249. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Ziada KM, Tuzcu EM, De Franco AC, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of the prevalence and cause of angiographic, ,haziness" following high-pressure coronary stenting. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 116-121. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Briguori C, Anzuini A, Airoldi F, et al. Intravascular Ultrasound Criteria for the Assessment of the Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenoses and Comparison with Fractional Flow Reserve. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 136-141. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Abizaid A, Mintz GS, Pichard A, et al. Clinical, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Quantitative Angiographic Determinants of the Coronary Flow Reserve Before and After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 423-428. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Nishioka T, Amanullah A, Luo H, et al. Clinical Validation of Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging for Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Severity. Comparison With Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1870-1878. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, Suzuki K, et al. Clinical Potential of Intravascular Ultrasound for Physiological Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. Circulation 1999; 100: 250-255. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Abizaid A, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. Long Term Follow-up After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Was Not Performed Based on Intravascular Ultrasound Findings. Circulation 1999; 100: 256-261. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Abizaid A, Mintz GS, A.Abizaid, et at. One-Year Follow-up After Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment of Moderate Left Main Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Ambiquous Angiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 707-715. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Mizuno K, Kurita A, Imazeki N. Pathological findings after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Br Herat J 1984; 52: 588-590. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Honey J, Mahon D, Jain A, et al. Morphological effects of coronary balloon angioplasty in vivo assessed by intravascular ultrasound imaging. Circulation 1992; 85: 1012-1025. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Mintz GS, Pichard AD, Kovach JA, et al. Impact of preinterventional intravascular ultrasound imaging on transcatheter treatment strategies in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 423-430. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Colombo A, Tobis J. Techniques in coronary artery stenting. Martin Dunitz. London 2000: 1-39.
  27. Stankovic G, Colombo A, Bersin R, et al. Comparison of directional coronary atherectomy and stenting versus stenting alone for the treatment of de novo and restenotic coronary artery narrowing. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 953-958. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Stone G, Hodgson J, Goar F, et al. Improved procedural results of coronary angioplasty with intravascular ultrasound-guided balloon sizing. The CLOUT Pilot Trial. Circulation 1997; 95: 2044-2052. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Haase K, Athanasiadis A, Mahrholdt H, et al. Acute and one year follow-up results after vessel size adapted PTCA using intravascular ultrasound. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 263-272. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Schroeder S, Baumbach A, Haase K, et al. Reduction of restenosis by vessel size adapted percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty using intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 875-879. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Abizaid A, Pichard A, Mintz GS, et al. Acute and long-term results of an intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/provisional stent implantation strategy. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 1298-1303. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Schiele F, Meneveau N, Gilard M, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided balloon angioplasty compared with stent. Immediate and 6-month results of the multicenter, randomized balloon equivalent to stent study (BEST). Circulation 2003; 107: 545-551. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Frey A, Hodgson J, Muller Ch, et al. Ultrasound-guided strategy for provisional stenting with focal balloon combination catheter. Results from the randomized strategy for intracoronary ultrasound-guided PTCA and stenting (SIPS) trial. Circulation 2000; 102: 2497-2502. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Gaster A, Skjoldborg S, Larsen J, et al. Continued improvement of clinical outcome and cost effectiveness following intravascular ultrasound guided PCI: insight from a prospective, randomized study. Heart 2003; 89: 1043-1049. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Mueller Ch, Hodgson J, Schindler Ch, et al. Cost-effectiveness of intracoronary ultrasound for percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91: 143-147. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Colombo A, De Gregorio J, Moussa I, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with provisional spot stenting for treatment of long coronary lesion. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 1427-1433. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Bassand JP. Intravascular ultrasound guided PTCA: a way to escape stent mania? Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 92-94. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Colombo A Hall P, Nakamura S, et al. Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation 1995; 91: 1891-1893. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Ahmed JM, Mintz GS, Weissman NJ, et al. Mechanism of lumen enlargement during intracoronary stent implantation. An intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2000; 102: 7-10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Mehran R, Dangas G, Mintz GS, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque burden and CK-MB elevation after coronary interventions: an intravascular ultrasound study of 2256 patients. Circulation 2000; 101: 604-610. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Iakovou I, Mintz GS, Dangas G, et al. Increased CK-MB release is a, ,trade off" for optimal stent implantation. An intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 1900-1905. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Gorge G, Haude M, Ge J, et al. Intravascular Ultrasound After low and high inflation pressure coronary artery stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 725-730. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Schiele F, Meneveau N, Vuillemenot A, et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in stent deployment on 6 month restenosis rate: a multicenter, randomized study comparing two strategies-with and without intravascular ultrasound guidance. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 320-328. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Choi JW, Goodreau LM, Davidson ChJ, et al. Resource utilization and clinical outcomes of coronary stenting single-photon emission computed topographic myocardial perfusion imaging after coronary stenting. Am Heart J 2001; 142: 112-118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  45. Iakovou I, Alfonso F, Goicolea J, Hernandes R, et al. Arterial perforation during optimization of coronary stents using High-pressure balloon inflations. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 1169-1172. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  46. Bermejo J, Botas J, Garcia E, et al. Mechanism of residual lumen stenosis after high-pressure stent implantation. A quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1998; 98: 112-118. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  47. Ponde CK, Aroney CN, McEniery PT, et al. Plaque prolapse between struts of the intracoronary Palmaz-Schatz stent: report of two cases with a novel treatment of this unusual problem. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997; 40: 353-357. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. de Jaegere P, Mudra H, Figulla H, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment. Immediate and 6 months clinical and angiographic results from the Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study (MUSIC Study). Eur Herat J 1998; 19: 1214-1223. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Blasini R, Neumann FJ, Schmitt C, et al. Restenosis rate after intravascular ultrasound-guided coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998; 44: 380-386. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  50. Mudra H, di Mario C, de Jaegere P, et al. Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation under ultrasound or angiographic guidance to reduce stent restenosis (OPTICUS study). Circulation 2001; 104: 1343-1349. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  51. Fitzgerald PJ, Oshima A, Hayase M, et al. Final Results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) Study. Circulation 2000; 102: 523-530. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  52. Russo RJ, Nicosia A, Teirstein PS. Angiography vs. intravascular ultrasound -directed stent placement (abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29(A Suppl): 60A.
  53. Oemrawsingh PV, Mintz GS, Schalij M, et al. Intravascular ultrasound guidance improves angiographic and clinical outcome of stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses. Final results of a Randomized Comparison With Angiographic Guidance (TULIP Study). Circulation 2003; 107: 62-67. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  54. Moussa I, Di Mario C, Moses J, et al. Does the specific intravascular ultrasound criterion used to optimize stent expansion have an impact on the probability of stent restenosis? Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 1012-1017. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  55. Hong MK, Mintz GS, Hong MK, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of target lesion revascularization after stenting of protected left main coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 175-179. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  56. Hong MK, Park SW, Lee ChW, et al. Intravascular ultrasound findings in stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 670-673. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  57. Nishida T, Colombo A, Briguori C, et al. Outcome of nonobstructive residual dissections detected by intravascular ultrasound following percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 1257-1262. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  58. Schroeder S, Baumbach A, Mohrholdt H, et al. The impact of untreated coronary dissection on acute and long-term outcome after intravascular ultrasound guided PTCA. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 137-145. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  59. Schwarzacher SP, Metz JA, Yock PG, et al. Vessel tearing at the edge of intracoronary stents detected with intravascular ultrasound imaging. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997 Feb; 40(2): 152-155. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  60. Sheris SJ, Canos MP, Weissman NJ, et al. Natural history of intravascular ultrasound-detected edge dissections from coronary stent deployment. Am Heart J 2000; 139: 59-63. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  61. Rensing BJ, Hermans WRM, Beatt KJ, et al. Quantitative angiographic assessment of elastic recoil after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 1039-1044. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  62. Mintz GS, Popma J, Hong MK, et al. Intravascular ultrasound to discern device-specific effects and mechanisms of restenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78(suppl 3A): 18-22. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  63. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR, et al. Patterns and mechanism on in stent restenosis: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1996; 94: 1247-1254. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  64. Weissman NJ, Wilensky RL, Tanguay JF, et al. Extent and distribution of in-stent intimal hyperplasia and edge effect in a non-radiation stent population. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 248-252. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  65. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, et al. Intimal hyperplasia thickness at follow-up is independent of stent size: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1168-1172. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  66. Spanos V, Stankovic G, Tobis J, et al. The challenge of in-stent restenosis: insight from intravascular ultrasound. Eur Herat J 2003; 24: 138-150. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  67. Colombo A, Tobis J, Techniques in coronary artery stenting. Martin Dunitz, London UK 2000, 28-35.
  68. Hong MK, Park SW, Lee ChW, et al. Relation between residual plaque burden after stenting and six-month angiographic restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 368-371. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  69. Castagna MT, Mintz GS, Leiboff BO, et al. The contribution of, ,mechanical" problems to in-stent restenosis: An Intravascular ultrasonographic analysis of 1090 consecutive in-stent restenosis lesions. Am Heart J 2001; 142: 970-974. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  70. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis in lesions treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 43-49. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  71. Hong MK, Park SW, Mintz GS, et al. Intravascular ultrasonic predictors of angiographic restenosis after long coronary stenting. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85: 441-445. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  72. Shiran A, Mintz GS, Waksman R et al. Early lumen loss after treatment of in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1998; 98: 200-203. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  73. de Feyter PJ, Kay P, Disco C, et al. Reference chart derived from post-stent-implantation intravascular ultrasound predictors of 6-moth expected restenosis on quantitative coronary angiography. Circulation 1999; 100: 1777-1783. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  74. Prati F, di Mario C, Moussa I, et al. In-stent neointimal proliferation correlates with the amount of residual plaque burden outside the stent: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1999; 99: 1011-1014. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  75. Spanos V, Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Popma JJ, et al. Chronic arterial responses to stent implantation: a serial intravascular ultrasound analysis of Palmaz-Schatz stents in native coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1134-1139. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  76. Kim Yhm Hong MK, Lee SW, et al. Randomized comparison of debulking followed by stenting versus stenting alone for ostial left anterior descending artery stenosis: intravascular ultrasound guidance. Am Heart J 2004; 148: 663-669. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  77. Sahara M, Kirigaya H, Oikawa Y, et al. Soft plaque detected on intravascular ultrasound is the strongest predictor of in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound study. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 2026-2033. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  78. Cheneau E, Leborgne L, Mintz GS, et al. Predictors of subacute stent thrombosis. Results of a systematic intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2003; 108: 43-47. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  79. Schuhlen H, Kastrati A, Dirschinger J, et al. Intracoronary stenting and risk for major adverse cardiac events during the first month. Circulation 1998; 98: 101-111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  80. Uren NG, Schwarzacher P, Metz JA, et al. Predictors and outcomes of stent thrombosis. An intravascular ultrasound registry. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 124-132. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  81. Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid A, et al. Lack of neointimal proliferation after implantation of sirolimus-coated stents in human coronary arteries: a quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2001; 103: 192-195. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  82. Sousa JE, Costa MA, Abizaid AC, et al. Sustained suppression of neointimal proliferation by sirolimus-eluting stents: one-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up. Circulation 2001; 104: 2007-2011. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  83. Holmes DR Jr, Leon MB, Moses JW, Popma JJ, Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis. Circulation 2004; 109: 634-640. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  84. Degertekin M, Lemos P, Lee CHH, et al. Intravascular ultrasound evaluation after sirolimus eluting stent implantation for de novo and in-stent restenosis lesions. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 32-38. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  85. Hong MK, Minz GS, Lee ChW, et al. Paclitaxel coating reduces in-stent intimal hyperplasia in human coronary arteries. A serial volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis from the aSian Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Clinical Trial (ASPECT). Circulation 2003; 107: 517-520. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  86. Tanabe K, Serruys PW, Grube E, et al. In-stent restenosis treated with stent-based delivery of paclitaxel incorporated in a slow-release polymer formulation. Circulation 2003; 107: 559-564. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  87. Degertekin M, Regar E, Tanabe K, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent for treatment of complex in-stent restenosis: the first clinical experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 184-189. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  88. Sonoda S, Morino Y, Jako J, et al. Impact of final stent dimensions on long-term results following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Serial intravascular ultrasound analysis from the SIRIUS trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1959-1963. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  89. Blackman DJ, Porto I, Shirodaria Ch, et al. Usefulness of high-pressure post-dilatation to optimize deployment of drug-eluting stents for the treatment of diffuse in-stent coronary restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 922-925. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  90. Lemos PA, Saia F, Ligthart J, et al. Coronary restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Morphological description and mechanistic analysis from a consecutive series of cases. Circulation 2003; 108: 257-260. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  91. Muňoz JS, Abizaid A, Mintz GS, et al. Intravascular ultrasound study of effects of overlapping sirolimus-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 470-473. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  92. Kern MJ, Donohue TJ, Aguirre FV, et al. Clinical outcome of deferring angioplasty in patients with normal translesional pressure-flow velocity measurement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 178-187. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  93. Bech GJ, De Bruyne B,Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation 2001; 103: 2928-2934. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  94. Yamagishi M, Terashima M, Awano K, et al. Morphology of Vulnerable Coronary plaque: Insights from Follow-up of Patients Examined by Intravascular Ultrasound Before an Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 106-111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  95. Hoye A, Lemos P, Arampatzis Ch, et al. Effectiveness of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for Coronary Narrowings < 50% in Diameter. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 112-114. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  96. Ricciardi M, Meyers S, Choi K, et al. Angiographically silent left main disease detected by intravascular ultrasound: A marker for future adverse cardiac events. Am Heart J 2003; 146: 507-512. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  97. Ge J, Liu F, Görge G, et al. Angiographically, ,silent" plaque in the left main coronary artery detected by intravascular ultrasound. Coronary Artery disease 1995; 6: 805-810. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  98. Wolfhard U, Görge G, Konorza T, et al. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination reverses therapeutic decision from percutaneous intervention to a surgical approach in patients with alterations of the left main stem. Thorac.Cardiovasc.Surg 1998; 46: 281-284. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  99. Leesar M, Masden R, Jasti V. Physiological and intravascular ultrasound assessment of an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 62: 349-357. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  100. Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V, et al. Correlation between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 2004; 110: 2831-2836. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  101. Park SJ, Hong MK, Lee ChW, et al. Elective stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Effect of debulking before stenting and intravascular ultrasound guidance. JACC 2001; 38: 1054-1060. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  102. Goar FG, Pinto FJ, Alderman EL, et al. Intracoronary ultrasound in cardiac transplant recipients. In vivo of, ,angiographically silent" intimal thickening. Circulation 1992; 85: 979-987. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  103. Hausmann D, Erbel R, Alibelli-Chemarin MJ et al. The safety of intracoronary ultrasound: a multicentric survey of 2207 examinations. Circulation 1995; 91: 623-630. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  104. Erbel R, Ge J, Gerbel T. Safety and limitations of intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 1992; 86: I195.




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.