Interv Akut Kardiol. 2004;3(2):83-85

ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN PATIENTS WITH THE HISTORY OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING

Miroslav Brtko
Kardiochirurgická klinika LF UK a Kardiocentrum FN Hradec Králové

The patients with the history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) admitted for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have uncertain prognosis. These patients are mostly polymorbid, have low ejection fraction of the left ventricle and triple vessel disease. AMI has often atypical manifestation in these patients, is smaller and has worse prognosis. The patients with the history of CABG are less often treated by reperfusion therapy compared to the patients without the history of CABG. The prognosis is especially unfavourable, when the venous bypass is an infarct-related artery. The primary percutaneous coronary intervention achieves better results in the treatment of these patients in comparison to thrombolysis; unfortunatelly both methods of treatment have worse results than in patients without the history of CABG.

Keywords: acute myocardial infarction, aortocoronary bypass, primary percutaneous coronary interventions, thrombolysis.

Published: December 31, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Brtko M. ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN PATIENTS WITH THE HISTORY OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2004;3(2):83-85.

Pacienti po chirurgické revaskularizaci myokardu (CABG - coronary artery bypass grafting), kteří jsou hospitalizováni pro akutní infarkt myokardu (AIM), jsou velmi rizikoví. Jde vesměs o polymorbidní nemocné s nízkou ejekční frakcí (EF) levé komory a postižením 3 arterií. AIM se u nich často manifestuje atypicky, je rozsahem menší a má horší prognózu. Reperfuzní léčbou jsou tito nemocní léčeni méně často, než nemocní bez anamnézy CABG. Je-li infarktovou tepnou žilní štěp, je prognóza nemocného obzvláště nepříznivá. Primární perkutánní koronární intervence (PCI) dosahuje v léčbě pacientů s anamnézou CABG lepších výsledků, než trombolýza (TL); obě léčebné metody však mají u této skupiny pacientů horší výsledky, než u pacientů doposud neoperovaných.

ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN PATIENTS WITH THE HISTORY OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING

The patients with the history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) admitted for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have uncertain prognosis. These patients are mostly polymorbid, have low ejection fraction of the left ventricle and triple vessel disease. AMI has often atypical manifestation in these patients, is smaller and has worse prognosis. The patients with the history of CABG are less often treated by reperfusion therapy compared to the patients without the history of CABG. The prognosis is especially unfavourable, when the venous bypass is an infarct-related artery. The primary percutaneous coronary intervention achieves better results in the treatment of these patients in comparison to thrombolysis; unfortunatelly both methods of treatment have worse results than in patients without the history of CABG.

Download citation

References

  1. Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, et al. Coronary Bypass Graft Fate and Patients Outcome: Angiographic Follow-up of 5065 Grafts Related to Survival and Reoperation in 1388 Patients During 25 Years. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28(3): 616-626. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Voutilainen S, Verkkala K, Jarvinen A, Keto P. Angiographic 5-Year Follow-up Study of Right Gastroepiploic Artery Grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62(2): 501-505. Go to original source...
  3. Mathew V, Gersh B, Barron H, et al. Inhospital Outcome of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Am Heart J 2002; 144(3): 463-469. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Moreno R, de Sá EL, López-Sendón J, et al. Determining Whether Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Previous Coronary Bypass Grafting Is the Result of Narrowing of a Bypass Konduit or of a Native Coronary Artery. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79(5): 670-671. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Labinaz M, Sketch MH, Ellis SG, et al. Outcome of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Receiving Thrombolytic Therapy. Am Heart J 2001; 141(3): 469-477. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D, et al. Long Distance Transport For Primary Angioplasty vs. Immediate Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Final Results of the Randomized National Multicentre Trial - PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J 2003; 24(1): 94-104. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K, et al. A Comparison of Coronary Angioplasty With Fibrinolytic Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANAMI-2). N Engl J Med 2003; 349(8): 733-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Al Suwaidi J, Velianou JL, Berger PB, et al. Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Am Heart J 2001; 142(3): 452-459. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Stone GW, Brodie BR, Griffin JJ, et al. Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes in Patients With Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Treated With Primary Balloon Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 605-611. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Interventional Cardiology

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.